My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENT 05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
061708
>
20 ATTACHMENT 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2008 8:25:50 AM
Creation date
6/13/2008 8:25:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENT 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br />PCUP-205, Paul and Janna Rocha <br />Application for a conditional use permit to relocate and replace the 5,000-gallon wood tank <br />with a new 5,000-gallon pol~ tank in the rear yard of the existing residence located at <br />481 Sycamore Road. Zoning for the property is PUD-A (Planned Unit Development - <br />Agriculture) District. <br />Chair Blank explained the procedure to be followed for the hearing, starting with the report from <br />staff, after which the public hearing will be opened. He continued that the applicants will be <br />given ten minutes to present their project, followed by any member of the public who will be <br />given five minutes to speak, and finally the applicants will be given another five minutes to <br />respond to the public comments. <br />Ms. Amos inquired if the appellants will also be given ten minutes to speak and noted that both <br />projects had appellants. Chair Blank replied that he did not realize there were appellants as the <br />project descriptions did not indicate that; he stated that appellants would also have ten minutes to <br />speak. <br />Ms. Decker clarified for the record that there are no appellants for either project. She stated that <br />this is the first hearing before the Planning Commission for both projects and added that there <br />may be those who do not support the project, but those are not considered appellants. <br />Ms. Amos then summarized the staff report and described the background, scope, and layout of <br />the proposed project. <br />Commissioner Fox disclosed that she visited one of the neighbors who is opposed to the project. <br />Commissioner Pearce disclosed that she visited with the applicant as well as with one of the <br />neighbors. <br />Chair Blank disclosed that he visited with the neighbor at 455 Sycamore Road. <br />Commissioner Olson disclosed that he met with the applicant and with the neighbor to the rear. <br />Commissioner Narum disclosed that she also met with the applicant and with the neighbor to the <br />rear. <br />Commissioner O'Connor disclosed that he also visited with the applicant and with the Segundos <br />who live to the rear. <br />Ms. Amos called the Commissioners' attention to a couple of revisions to the staff report. She <br />noted that in Condition No. 1 of Exhibit B, the date of the related materials should be <br />November 7, 2007 rather than November 7, 2008. She added that the height of the new poly <br />water tank at the bottom of the chart on page 5 of the staff report should be approximately <br />15 feet instead of 10 feet. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Apri19, 2008 Page 1 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.