Laserfiche WebLink
For the second element of the Initiative defining a "housing unit", if units within <br />assisted living facilities are counted against the housing cap, this will also have revenue <br />impacts to the City, estimated as a loss of $101,000 to $194,000 in net annual operating <br />revenues and a loss of $6.5 to $11.5 million in one-time development impact fees for <br />infrastructure. Counting assisted living units against the housing cap also reduces the <br />one-time development school impact fees projected to be received by the School District <br />by $1.1 to $11.9 million when the housing cap is reached. The following table <br />summarizes the fiscal impacts: <br />Summa of Fiscal Im acts related to Housin Unit Definition <br /> Rancte of Reduction <br /> Minimum Maximum <br />Annual _ <br />Reduction in Net Revenues Per Year $ 101,000 $ 194,000 <br />One-Time Development Fees <br />City $ 6,539,148 $ 11,485,584 <br />Pleasanton Unified School District $ 1,083,456 $ 11,947,320 <br />Other Agencies $ 12.402.324 $ 15.094.332 <br />Total $ 20,024,928 $ 38,527,236 <br />In summary, the effects of the Initiative on hillside development and counting <br />units towards the housing cap, as well as the impacts to City revenues and operating <br />expenses, will vary depending upon the interpretation and implementation of the <br />Initiative. <br />2. Introduction <br />At its May 20, 2008 meeting, the City Council received the certification results <br />for the Save Pleasanton's Hills & Housing Cap initiative. Council then directed staff to <br />provide a report analyzing the impacts and effects of the Initiative, as provided by <br />California Elections Code §9212, as well to provide information responding to the <br />questions raised by Council members and the public at the May 20, 2008 meeting <br />regarding both hillside protection regulations and options regarding the Initiative. <br />As required by State law, this report is being presented to the City Council within <br />the thirty day time limit. After its consideration of the report, the City Council must <br />decide whether to: (a) adopt the Initiative as written; or (b) place the Initiative on the <br />ballot for the next general municipal election -November 4, 2008. <br />3 <br />