17A ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

If the Initiative is adopted, it would be advisable to designate the ridges to which the 100 vertical foot restriction would apply, and it may be necessary, from time to time, to review a proposed development in light of the Initiative's intent rather than a literal application of its terms. Another option would be to identify an elevation line above which development would not be permitted to occur. This is the approach taken in the Pleasanton Ridge area along Foothill Road where the 670 ft. elevation line is the limit to development. However, there is less rationale for using this approach in the Southeast Hills due to its complex topography; structures above a certain elevation may not be visible in some cases and structures below that elevation line may be visible in other areas. Therefore, acase-by- case approach would better accomplish the Initiative's intent of creating development that is not visible from off site and/or that has a backdrop. 5.10 Define Structure The City's current General Plan does not include a definition of the word "structure". The Zoning Ordinance defines "structure" as "anything constructed or erected which requires a location on the ground, including a building or a swimming pool, but not including a fence or a wall used as a fence if the height does not exceed six feet, or access drives or walks."29 And, the Municipal Code adopts the California Building Code (CBC) by reference, which defines a structure as "that which is built or constructed." 5.11 If a project were to be reduced to less than 10 units, can houses be built on ridge tops? Although projects of 10 or fewer units are exempt from Policy 12.3 of the Initiative, the practical answer to this question is no, in light that all developments would be subject to the City's development review process that would likely not approve a house on a ridge top. 5.12 How should residential density be calculated? The question of how residential density should be calculated was previously discussed at a General Plan Land Use Workshop in March 2006, when the undeveloped properties on the west side of Pleasanton were considered. At that time, the City Council directed that land having slopes over 25% already designated on the General Plan Map as Residential continue to be included in a property's "gross developable acres" and land with slopes over 25% not be excluded from the calculation of residential density. "Gross developable acres" is the amount of land on which the maximum allowable number of dwelling units for a parcel is based. However, regardless of the maximum residential density calculated under the General Plan for any given parcel, the City Council, through the PUD development process, determines the appropriate (usually lower) number of units for that property. 29 See Municipal Code §18.08.535. 16