My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
061708
>
17A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2008 4:49:08 PM
Creation date
6/12/2008 4:49:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17A
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
consistent with the U.S. Census Bureau and the State of California definitions of a <br />housing unit when determining the housing cap. Although State law provides that <br />second units (which otherwise meet the Initiative's definition of a housing unit) are not to <br />be counted towards the housing cap, unresolved and hence subject to interpretation is <br />whether assisted living facilities, which likewise may meet the Initiative's definition of <br />housing unit, should count toward the housing cap. Counting rooms in assisted living <br />facilities against the housing cap will reduce the number of units available in the City, <br />potentially impacting the availability of workforce housing. <br />Fiscal Impact: <br />If the Initiative is adopted, shifting units from hillsides to other areas of the City, will likely <br />result in a fiscal impact to the City in the form of decreased net annual operating <br />revenues ranging from $69,000 to $183,000, as well as the loss of up to $2.8 million in <br />one-time development impact fees for infrastructure projects. Additionally, the <br />Pleasanton Unified School District is projected to receive $3.6 million to $12.9 million <br />less in one-time development school impact fees than would have otherwise been <br />anticipated when the housing cap is reached. The following table summarizes the fiscal <br />impacts related to the hillside policy: <br />Summa of Fiscal Im acts related to Hillside Polic <br /> Range of Reduction in Net Revenues <br /> Maximum Minimum <br />Annual _ <br />Reduction in Net Revenues Per Year $ 183,000 $ 69,000 <br />One-Time Development Fees <br />City $ 2,797,984 $ - <br />Pleasanton Unified School District $ 12,903,296 $ 3,590,230 <br />Other Agencies $ 2,423.232 $ 478.380 <br />Total One-Time Develo ment Fees $ 18,124,512 $ 4,068,610 <br />For the second element of the Initiative defining a "housing unit", if units within assisted <br />living facilities are counted against the housing cap, this will also have revenue impacts <br />to the City, estimated as a loss of $101,000 to $194,000 in net annual operating <br />revenues and a loss of $6.5 to $11.5 million in one-time development impact fees for <br />infrastructure. Counting assisted living units against the housing cap also reduces the <br />one-time development school impact fees projected to be received by the School <br />' For example, the City's Parkview Assisted Living Facility includes 86 units which have a bathroom and <br />kitchenette (e.g. kitchen sink, mini refrigerator and microwave oven) but all residents have a meal plan. Taking the <br />definition in the Initiative literally, these types of units would count against the housing cap. Historically, however, <br />the City has exempted units within assisted living facilities from the City's housing cap. Conversely, all <br />independent living units for seniors (e.g., the units within Ridgeview Commons, Kottinger Place, Pleasanton <br />Gardens, etc.) have been counted towards the housing cap, as well as all conventional housing units, including <br />single-family, multi-family, and mobile homes that house seniors (see Sections 5.20 and 5.25, below). <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.