Laserfiche WebLink
language that is legislative in nature and language which can be implemented by the City. She <br />also wants more clarification as to property rights and suggested moving forward and discuss <br />Item 21. <br />21. Received certification for the Initiative petition to "Save Pleasanton's Hills and Housing <br />Cap" and directed staff to prepare a report on the effects of the Initiative measure <br />City Attorney Roush said last year an Initiative Petition was submitted to the City and filed with <br />the City Clerk. In April, the petition was turned in, and forwarded to the County Registrar of <br />Voters, who confirmed the requisite number had been received, the City Clerk certified it, and <br />now it is before Council for certification. Following this, there are three choices-1) to adopt the <br />Initiative as submitted; 2) place the Initiative Petition on the November 2008 ballot; or 3) request <br />a report on a number of matters which is to be returned to the Council in 30 days for <br />consideration and decision to either adopt it as written or to submit the matter to the voters. <br />The report can include any matters, but more specifically, it could talk about the Initiative's fiscal <br />impacts, its effect on the internal consistency of the City's General Plan and its elements, its <br />effect on land use, the impact of availability and location of housing, the ability to meet regional <br />housing needs, impact for funding of infrastructure, impact on the community's ability to attract <br />or retain business, the impact on uses of vacant parcels of land, its impact on agricultural land, <br />open space, traffic, congestion, and any other matters the legislative body requests be in the <br />report. <br />Therefore, if the Council is not prepared to adopt or refer the matter to Election, staff would <br />request direction in terms of what the report should provide, which can be brought back at the <br />June 17 meeting. <br />Councilmember Sullivan confirmed with the City Attorney that staff could take all questions and <br />issues that had been raised from the public, staff, and the Council and provide analysis. He said <br />he submitted questions regarding a housing cap and asked for them to be included in the study. <br />The questions deal with the number of units that exist now and how the City has counted units <br />in the past, such as second units and assisted living units. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne asked how the Initiative defines a "housing unit" and what is its nexus to its <br />impact on infrastructure and the school district. City Manager Fialho said this was on the list and <br />there is ambiguity as to how the State defines it, said staff has worked on the U.S. Census who <br />considers the City's assisted living facility as a "group living quarter" and not a "unit" and not the <br />way the Initiative has defined a unit. He said the housing cap in the General Plan is vague and <br />states units will be counted up to 29,000 residential. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne said when the City looked at assisted living units for Staples Ranch, a <br />formula was reviewed that drew a nexus between the number of units we were going to count <br />under the cap and the recommended number we were going to count in the cap and its actual <br />impact on the infrastructure and schools and other things. This is what he is looking for, and City <br />Manager Fialho said staff will try to pull something together to address this. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said according to the Initiative, an extended stay hotel would count <br />toward the housing count. City Manager Fialho said the issue is, how the Initiative changes the <br />way staff goes about counting units. Today, the only exemption the City offers is second units, <br />assisted living, and skilled nursing. Everything else is counted. <br />City Council Minutes 11 May 20, 2008 <br />