My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1543
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
1543
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2009 10:34:07 AM
Creation date
6/10/2008 2:33:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/1977
DOCUMENT NO
PC 1977-1543
DOCUMENT NAME
REZONING
NOTES
MAIN ST AND BERNAL AVE
NOTES 2
JOHN EDGREN MANUEL DELIS AND VALLEY BANK
NOTES 3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 1543 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON MAKING THE FINDING THAT THE <br />PROPOSED PROJECT FILED UNDER RZ-77-6 WILL NOT <br />HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE <br />ENVIRONMENT. <br />WHEREAS, John Edgren, Manuel Delis and Valley Bank have applied for <br />a rezoning application to rezone approximately 3.1 acres of <br />land located at the southwest corner of Main Street and <br />Bernal Avenue and including all of those properties lying <br />between the City Hall and Main Street, and between Bernal <br />Avenue and the Pleasanton School District Administration <br />Building, from the O (Office) District and the P (Public <br />and institutional) District to the C-C (Central Commercial) <br />District; and <br />"- WHEREAS, in conjunction with this review an environmental assessment <br />in the form of an initial study for the project has been <br />conducted; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter <br />at its August 10, 1977, meeting and an opportunity was given <br />to hear public testimony on the potential environmental <br />impact of the project and no public testimony was given; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the provisions of the City's <br />guidelines and processing procedures for the evaluation of <br />projects in preparation of environmental reports as they <br />pertained to the requirements for negative declarations and <br />environmental reports to determine if a negative declaration <br />is appropriate and what mitigation measures must be under- <br />taken to insure that the project will not have a significant <br />effect upon the environment. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not <br />have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a <br />negative declaration is the appropriate environmental docu- <br />ment to be prepared for this project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.