My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
060308
>
18 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2008 11:48:44 AM
Creation date
5/29/2008 11:48:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
review to return to the Planning Commission, regardless of the number of stories. She inquired <br />whether it would be possible to add a condition requiring people to park on-site. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that a certain number of parking spaces could be required on-site, garaged <br />or otherwise. She noted that the Commission may require that the garages not be used as storage <br />and that they did not park RVs on-site. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she believed those restrictions would be workable. <br />Commissioner Pearce moved to make the finding that the PUD development plan is <br />covered by CEQA Class 32, Section 15332 (a-e) and is consistent with the General Plan for <br />the purposes of the PUD Ordinance; to make the PUD findings listed in the staff report; <br />and to recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD-73 as recommended by staff, <br />subject to the development plan shown in Exhibit A and the conditions of approval listed in <br />Exhibit B, with the following modifications that: (1) the height of the buildings for both <br />Parcel A and Parcel B be limited to their existing heights; (2) the maximum allowed FAR <br />be 30 percent; (3) Condition No. 5 be modified to indicate that garages may not be used for <br />storage, that RVs and other large recreational equipment may not be parked on-site, and <br />that these conditions be disclosed to future homeowners; (4) Condition No. 7 be modified to <br />require a Planning Commission-level design review for any future modifications; and <br />(5) The phrase in Condition No. 14 "as required by the Fire Department" be deleted and <br />the standard sprinkler language shall be inserted. <br />Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. <br />Ms. Harryman clarified that with two lots, there will be no CC&Rs and that conditions of <br />approval will apply. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that he would not support the height limit/story condition <br />because he did not believe the Commission should put conditions on height limits that were not <br />imposed on the rest of the neighborhood. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioner O'Connor. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Olson. <br />Resolution No. PC-2008-18 recommending approval to the City Council of PUD-73 was <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Apri123, 2008 Page 7 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.