My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
060308
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2008 2:57:47 PM
Creation date
5/28/2008 2:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SB 1625 -PLASTIC BOTTLE RECYCLING AND MARINE DEBRIS <br />POLLUTION PREVENTION <br />Senator Ellen Corbett <br />IN BRIEF <br />SB 1625 aims to significantly reduce the amount of plastic <br />litter pollution entering our marine environment by <br />expanding the scope of California's successful Bottle and <br />Can Recycling Law to include all plastic bottles. Plastic <br />marine debris pollution is a serious and growing problem, <br />the source of which is right here on land. Up to 80% of <br />marine debris pollution consists of plastic from urban litter. <br />Containers under California's Bottle and Can Rerychng Law <br />are littered less than other plastic items because they have a <br />redemption value. However, because plastics are the fastest <br />growing component of the waste stream, only about 50% of <br />plastic bottles are currently covered by California's Bottle <br />and Can Recycling Law. Expanding the program to include <br />all plastic bottles will significantly reduce plastic litter <br />pollution this measure will result in the rerycling of more <br />than 3 billion additional plastic bottles, reducing littered and <br />landfilled plastic waste by 130,000 tons annually. <br />THE ISSUE <br />Municipalities have spent billions trying to prevent urban <br />plastic litter from entering our watersheds. This is an <br />especially pressing issue for Southern Californian <br />communities that are required by US EPA Total Maximum <br />Daily Loads (I'MDL) for Trash to reach 0 trash levels by <br />2014. This is a serious and costly issue that requires a State <br />solution. <br />The collection and disposal of plastic bottles costs local <br />governments and ratepayers in excess of $32 million <br />annually. The increase in rerycling as a result of SB 1625 will <br />likely cut this disposal cost in half. What little plastic bottle <br />recycling is occurring now is primarily being subsidized by <br />local governments and ratepayers, at a cost more than $16 <br />million annually. SB 1625 will eliminate these existing costs <br />to curbside rerycling programs and instead provide curbside <br />programs with more than $67 million in new recycling <br />program revenue. SB 1625 and the resulting growth in <br />recycling represents a net revenue benefit to local <br />governments and curbside rerycling programs of roughly <br />$100 million annually. <br />EXISTING LAW <br />Marine debris pollution is poisoning our ocean and <br />burdening our $43 billion dollar ocean economy. Plastic <br />bottles are the second most-commonly found plastic litter <br />item on beaches, behind takeout food packaging. Plastic <br />bottle litter does not biodegrade; instead it breaks into <br />smaller pieces as a result of radiation from the sun. These <br />pieces kill millions of sea birds and thousands of marine <br />mammals and endangered sea turtles, as well as countless <br />fish, who mistake them for food. Litter pollution in the <br />Pacific Ocean congregates into a giant "garbage patch" <br />North of Hawaii that is twice the size of Texas. In this <br />"garbage" patch plastic outweighs plankton by a factor of <br />46! <br />Since its implementation in 1987, California's Bottle and <br />Can Rerycling Law has drastically reduced the presence of <br />regulated containers in the litter stream and has increased <br />container recycling levels to record levels. <br />California generates more than 6.5 billion plastic bottles and <br />approximately 300 million plastic-coated beverage boxes and <br />cartons annually, none of which are covered under existing <br />law. While 95 percent of these containers are technically <br />recyclable, less than 12% are actually rerycled. That means <br />more than 220,000 tons of plastic and plastic-coated paper is <br />littered or landfilled in California annually. Plastic does not <br />biodegrade-so if not recycled, this waste continues to <br />accumulate, year after you. If littered or blown from <br />reciptcles, this accumulating plastics waste can quickly enter <br />our marine environment through storm drains and creeks. <br />California's Bottle and Can Rerycling Law requires that <br />regulated containers by assigned a refund value that is <br />redeemed by consumers when the container is recycled. <br />Alternatively, consumers can donate the container to a <br />nonprofit recycler. Unredeemed funds are used to fund <br />curbside rerycling, litter abatement, market development <br />grants, and other programs. Currently, California's Bottle <br />and Can Recycling Law covers beer and malt beverages, soft <br />drinks, water, sports drinks, and other specified beverages in <br />glass, plastic and aluminum containers. <br />WHAT THE BILL DOES <br />SB 1625 will add all plastic bottles to California's Bottle and <br />Can Rerycling Law, including food product bottles, <br />cosmetic product bottles and cleaning product bottles. SB <br />16525 ends the exclusion from the program given to certain <br />paperboard and aseptic containers. SB 1625 also ends the <br />confusing practice of calculating an inflated "redemption <br />rate" and will instead rely upon the more accurate "recycling <br />rate" and provides a temporary processing fee fix so that <br />existing program members are not unfairly penalized by the <br />temporary recycling rate fluctuation caused by the inclusion <br />of new containers. <br />SUPPORT <br />Californians Against Waste (Sponsor) <br />May 21, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.