My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 86187
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
RES 86187
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 4:42:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/1999 11:29:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ability of a developer to proceed with the development as <br />contemplated by the Offering Memorandum; (vii) an event <br />described in paragraph 8 hereof occurs which in the opinion <br />of the Underwriter requires a supplement or amendment to the <br />Offering Memorandum, and such supplement or amendment is not <br />agreed to be the City; and <br /> <br /> (e) At or prior to the Closing, the Underwriter shall <br />have received each of the following documents: <br /> <br /> (1) Opinions, in form and substance satisfactory <br />to the City and the Underwriter, dated as of the Closing <br />Date, of (a) Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry, Bond Counsel, <br />approving, without qualification, the validity of the bonds <br />and the exemption of the interest thereon from federal and <br />state personal income taxation, as described in the Offering <br />Memorandum; <br /> <br /> (2) A letter of Bond Counsel, dated the date of <br />the Closing and addressed to the Underwriter, to the effect <br />that the opinion referred to in the preceding subparagraph <br />may be relied upon by the Underwriter to the same extent as <br />if such opinion were addressed to them; <br /> <br /> (3) A supplementary opinion, dated the date of <br />the Closing and addressed to the Underwriter, to the effect <br />that (i) this Purchase Contract has been duly authorized, <br />executed and delivered by, and, assuming due authorization, <br />execution and delivery by the Underwriter, constitutes a <br />legal, valid and binding agreement of the City enforceable <br />in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability <br />may be limited by the application of equitable principles if <br />equitable remedies are sought; (ii) the bonds are not <br />subject to the registration requirements of the Securities <br />Act of 1933, as amended, and the Resolution is exempt from <br />qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as <br />amended; (iii) the Bonds conform as to form and tenor to the <br />description thereof contained under the caption "The Bonds" <br />in the Offering Memorandum, and the statements contained <br />therein under the captions "The Bonds"; The Project"; <br />"Bondholders' Risks"; and "Tax Exemption" insofar as such <br />statements purport to summarize certain provisions of the <br />1913 Act, the Bond Law, the Bonds, the Resolution, the <br />Proceedings or applicable provisions of the United States <br />Internal Revenue Code, present a fair and accurate summary <br />of such provisions; and, in connection with Bond Counsel's <br />participation in the Proceedings land in the preparation of <br />the Offering Memorandum, but without undertaking <br />independently to verify the accuracy or completeness of the <br />statements in the Offering Memorandum, Bond Counsel has no <br />reason to believe that the Offering Memorandum, as of the <br />date of Closing, contained any untrue statement of a <br />material fact or omitted to state a material fact required <br />to be stated therein or necessary to made the statements <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.