My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
052008
>
14 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2008 2:39:06 PM
Creation date
5/15/2008 2:39:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENT 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />Meeting with HOA Architectural Control Committee <br />During the month of August, staff had further assessed the possibility of combining the <br />applicant's request to reduce the setbacks for an accessory structure (pool) with a "global" <br />development modification to legalize the structures that were put in without City approval and to <br />resolve the approval by the City of the water feature located at 8024 Oak Creek Drive <br />(PUD-99-01-07M). <br />On September 18, 2007, staff met with the applicant and conference called Nicole Norris, two of <br />the three Architectural Control Committee (ACC) members to discuss a "global" setback for the <br />development using the applicant's request. Staff notes that the third member on the ACC, Reza <br />Jannatpour, was unavailable to attend or conference call for this meeting; however both of the <br />ACC members said that they would discuss the outcome of the meeting with him. The meeting <br />was a general discussion related to other accessory structures and existing construction work <br />(i.e. pools, trellises, arbors, retaining walls, sheds, etc.) that has placed these structures outside <br />of the established setbacks. Staff suggested that the ACC, with concurrent approval of the <br />HOA, consider modifying the PUD setbacks for all the lots in since there appeared to be an <br />interest in locating structures closer to the lot boundaries than what was originally envisioned. <br />Mr. Spencer was agreeable to this, so long as it did not hold up the process of his individual <br />application. The ACC members said that they would discuss this question and confirm to staff <br />what other structures may not be conforming to the current development standards. Please see <br />staff's a-mail dated Monday, September 24, 2007 and the applicant's response to that a-mail <br />dated Tuesday, September in Exhibit D-lregard accessory structures in the Lemoine Ranch <br />Development. <br />City's Request for Lemoine Ranch Setback Modification <br />After discussing the "global" setbacks with the two ACC members, staff began to assess the <br />PUD development plan to specifically address each lot with appropriate setbacks since the lots <br />were initially approved with smaller homes and larger lots; however, the homes were later made <br />larger during the tentative map approval stage, thus, making the houses larger and in turn <br />making the lot sizes smaller. Please see Exhibit I for the PUD development plan and for the <br />individual lots on the approved tract map. Staff met with the applicant on November 16, 2007 <br />and provided him with a map of what the City would likely support for setbacks on each of the <br />lots in the Lemoine Development. The applicant stated that he would take this back to the ACC <br />and discuss it at their next HOA meeting to see if this was something that the other homeowners <br />were interested in pursing. <br />Staff was contacted by the concerned neighbor, Terry Besso, on January 7, 2008 requesting <br />some clarification to the applicant's application; please see the a-mail from Mr. Besso dated <br />Monday, January 7, 2007 in Exhibit D-2. The e-mail also addressed Mr. Besso's willingness to <br />PUD-99-01-OS, Steven Spencer Planning Commission <br />6of11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.