Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 4: Rear Yard View towards Besso Residence <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br />The applicant is proposing to modify condition of approval #8, for his property only, of case <br />PUD-99-O1, as shown below: <br />".8. The minimum setback regulations for all main structures, Class I, and Class II <br />accessory structures on lots 1-12 shall be as follows: <br />Front Side Street Side Rear <br />Yard Yard Yard Yard <br />Lots 1,2, & 10 150' ab 25'a 25'a 20'a <br />Lots 3-9, ll, & 12 23'a~a ~'-~ 15'ad ~~,~ <br />5'a~ 5':~a <br />a'3tructure located outside an approved building envelope shown o1i the approved <br />tentative map shall follow the natural grade and cut and fill shall be limited to <br />less than three feet in height. <br />b The setback shall be measure from the westerly edge of the Foothill Road edge of <br />pavement as established by the approved interim alignment plan. <br />20' minimum front yard setback for side entry garages. <br />a On lots 3,4, and 6 no structures, including additions, may be placed in the <br />"structure setback" area as designed on Exhibit A. <br />The applicants request for the modification listed above is site specific only and would not <br />apply to the entire development. The proposed modification would reduce the rear and side yard <br />setbacks for a pool, spa, and waterfall feature to be located in the right rear yard of the rear lot. <br />"The closest portion of the pool would be located approximately 29-feet 11-inches from the rear <br />of the subject house and approximately 5-feet from the rear fence. The total length of the rear <br />PUD-99-01-OS, Steven Spencer Planning Commission <br />4of11 <br />