Laserfiche WebLink
size of the second unit, parking requirements, and participation in the City's monitoring <br />program to determine rent levels of the second units being rented. Current restrictions <br />and regulations may be obtained from the City of Pleasanton Planning Department. <br />These restrictions and regulations shall be binding upon any successor in ownership of <br />the property. <br />O. Except as modified by the Second Unit chapter, all other regulations embodied in the <br />zoning of the property for Class I accessory structures shall apply to the development of <br />detached second units on one-family residential lots. <br />As proposed and conditioned, the proposed second unit complies with the above Municipal <br />Code standards. The proposed second unit also complies with the applicable site development <br />standards in terms of setbacks, height, and size. The proposed 17.2% floor area ratio with the <br />second unit would not exceed the 20% maximum floor area ratio requirement for this <br />development. The applicants would create the required parking space for the second unit. Since <br />the size of the unit is limited, and there is only one bedroom proposed, the traffic generated by <br />the main residence plus anyone who might live in the second unit would not be significantly <br />greater than the amount of traffic generated by a typical single-family residence of this size. <br />The Code requires that either the primary dwelling or the secondary unit be owner-occupied, <br />which would prevent the property being perceived as amulti-family rental property. <br />Furthermore, there are adequate public roadways, public utilities, and public services to serve <br />the second unit. <br />Design Review <br />The detached second unit is considered a Class I Accessory Structure as defined by the <br />Municipal Code. Chapter 18.20 (Design Review) of the Municipal Code indicates that in order <br />to preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic values and to ensure the preservation of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare, accessory structures greater than ten feet in height are <br />subject to administrative design review. Staff notes that even though a proposed accessory <br />structure may comply with the development standards of the applicable zoning district, through <br />the design review process the Municipal Code allows the reviewing body to approve conditions <br />that maybe more restrictive than the normal Code standards to ensure that the public health, <br />safety, or general welfare is preserved. As outlined in the Design Review Chapter, the Zoning <br />Administrator's or Planning Commission's scope of review of project plans shall include such <br />design criteria as: <br />• Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to it. <br />PAP-117 Planning Commission <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />