Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum and Fox. <br />NOES: Commissioners Blank, Olson, and Pearce. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />The motion failed. <br />Chair Blank noted that he would support the original motion on the floor. He noted that there <br />were no view easements and believed the applicant showed good faith. He understood the <br />appellants' position with respect to view easements and believed that the impact to the view was <br />nonexistent. He noted that without a view easement, the appellant did not have the right to <br />prevent someone from encroaching on that view. He believed the applicant had been very <br />willing to be flexible when he was not legally required to do so. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she was not as concerned about the view as the welfare of the <br />neighbor on the downhill side. <br />Commissioner Fox concurred with Commissioner Narum's comment that the view was not an <br />issue for her. She was concerned that the applicant considered this to be a second dwelling and a <br />poolhouse and believed it should be placed closer to the primary residence. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioners Narum and Fox. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2008-12 denying PAP-117, thereby upholding the Zoning <br />Administrator's approval of PADR-1762, and PC-208-13, recommending approval of <br />PUD-99-09-02M to the City Council, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2008 Page 7 of 7 <br />