Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />TRANSITION PLAN <br />ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />July 28, 2004 <br />Updated February 1, 2008 <br />The City of Pleasanton retained Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. to assist in performing <br />an accessibility evaluation of City public facilities. The evaluation included a visual <br />survey of the buildings and a review of the building layouts and resulted in the <br />Accessibility Evaluation Report. The intent of the evaluation was to identify features in <br />the buildings and sites which do not comply with the accessibility requirements of the <br />Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and when applicable, the more stringent, <br />California Building Code (CBC). This process began in early 2002, and is the basis for <br />this Transition Plan and how the City will comply with the ADA/Section 504. <br />Since preparation of the Accessibility Evaluation, the City has made numerous facility <br />improvements to address these issues and continues to fund accessibility <br />improvements through it Facilities Renovation Fund and facility remodel and <br />expansions. <br />The main portion of the Accessibility Evaluation Report contains information regarding <br />requirements for new construction, alterations and additions, and information regarding <br />the removal of barriers for existing buildings. The report includes a summary of the <br />overall accessibility of each building, and a summary of the applicable codes. <br />In an effort to effectively meet ADA standards, the City, in evaluating and addressing <br />the deficiencies, has created priorities for implementing improvements. The basis for the <br />priorities is taken from the information relating to Title III/Public Accommodations. In <br />conformance with Title III, public priorities have been developed to accommodate <br />building areas that deal with, or provide goods and services to, the general public. <br />Other parts of the building, such as those associated only with employee areas, have a <br />lower priority in part because under Title II and III, these areas are not required to <br />address the removal of barriers, but are required to comply with Title I/Employment <br />requirements. The priorities also consider budgetary constraints and are intended to <br />help the City evaluate and develop a program for compliance with the ADA. <br />