My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
041508
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 2:12:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1268 Quarry Lane, Suite A <br />The subject tenant suite contains a large open space for the martial arts/activity area, a <br />separate break/computer room, a front office waiting room, bathrooms, and a <br />storage/office area. Pictures of these can be found in Attachment 4.1-C. As proposed in <br />the appellant's final written narrative, the children's program will operate Monday <br />through Friday from 11:30 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. while the adult program (students 16 years <br />and older) will operate Monday and Thursday evenings from 6:45 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and <br />Tuesdays from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. For more detailed information regarding the <br />appellant's programs and activities, please see the Planning Commission staff report in <br />Attachment 3. <br />Pursuant to the use permit process, staff evaluated the appellant's third narrative <br />request and scheduled the application for review by the Planning Commission. In <br />response to the Planning Commission public hearing notice, the parents of the children <br />who attend the facility expressed support to allow the use to continue operation. Please <br />see Attachment 7 for correspondence written prior to and since the Planning <br />Commission hearing. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Planning_Commission <br />On February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the <br />subject application. After hearing staff's presentation and taking public testimony, the <br />Commission denied the use permit by a 5-to-0 vote. The Commission felt that the <br />appellant's use appeared to be more of a daycare facility and that a State child care <br />license would be appropriate for this business. The Commission agreed that the use <br />would be compatible with surrounding uses within Valley Business Park and that the <br />appellant has modified his use to address staff's parking and circulation concerns. <br />However, the Commission felt that the current business operation would be detrimental <br />to the public health, safety, and welfare because children could freely come and go from <br />the facility. Although the parents would sign waivers designed to exempt the use from <br />State licensing requirements, allowing grade school (and younger) children to come and <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.