My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
041508
>
17 ATTACHMENT 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 1:53:12 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 1:53:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The long and narrow configuration of the site has imposed some constraints in site development. <br />The applicant proposes a site plan that has units interacting with the streets (Vineyard Avenue <br />and Vine Street), creating a relationship between the proposed project and the existing <br />neighborhood. In recognizing the existence of the apartment buildings on the adjoining property <br />to the west, the applicant enhances the rear elevation of the buildings. <br />In response to the residents' comments on guest parking spaces, the applicant added an <br />additional parking space near Vineyard Avenue. As such, a total of five guest parking spaces <br />would be provided for this 10-unit townhouse development. <br />Architectural Design <br />The proposed design scheme consists of varied wall articulations. The buildings would have a <br />stucco finish with trim around the windows and exposed wood brackets and corbels at the eaves. <br />The units would face east except for the end units that they front Vineyard Avenue and Vine <br />Street. The architectural design is compatible with the area, specifically they are compatible <br />with Birch Creek Townhouses and the newly constructed Birch Terrace Condominium <br />development to the west of the site. Staff has found the design is professionally executed; <br />therefore, did not request peer review. <br />In response to the comments raised at the neighborhood meeting, the applicants have revised the <br />designs to provide more interest and articulation on the rear elevations. The revised rear <br />elevation exhibits gable roofs and wall articulations that mimic the front elevations. Below are <br />the "before" and "after" elevations to demonstrate modifications. <br />Y `, ` , , 1 <br />-~ ~.. <br />.: } '-,' <br />..,,,... <br />~T ATiON <br />Originally Proposed Rear Elevation <br /> <br />~..1~x eis!nT~ <br />;~,,~..r.~. <br />Revised Rear Elevation <br />Case No. PUD-71 Planning Commission <br />Page - 7 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.