My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
041508
>
17 ATTACHMENT 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 1:53:12 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 1:53:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
located on Bernal Avenue between Stanley Boulevard and Nevada Street, was pending review in <br />August 2005. Therefore, it is unnecessary to perform a separate traffic study to investigate <br />traffic impact at the same intersections. Additionally, the Bernal Commercial Project has a <br />higher traffic impact on the intersections than the proposed 10-unit residential townhouse <br />project. The Bernal Commercial Project was not required to mitigate the existing traffic other <br />than paying the required traffic fees. The City Traffic Engineer recommends that the applicant <br />pay for the required traffic fee. A condition of approval has addressed this issue. <br />Parking <br />Many properties on the north side of Vineyard Avenue between First Street and Stanley <br />Boulevard have ahigh-density zoning designation. As such, the neighbors have expressed <br />dissatisfaction that curbside parking in the front of their homes have been impacted by the <br />residents in the apartment complexes due to the lack of adequate on-site parking provided by the <br />existing developments. The neighbors wanted to see additional guest parking be provided. <br />The Parking Ordinance requires, for amultiple-family residential development, the applicant <br />provide one guest parking space for every seven residential units. In this case, and based on the <br />parking requirement, two guest parking spaces would be required for the proposed 10-unit <br />residential development. <br />In recognizing the parking situation in the existing neighborhood, the applicant proposed four <br />guest parking spaces for uses by the visitors of this ten-unit development. In response to the <br />neighbors' concerns, the applicant has revised the site plan and has made room for an additional <br />guest parking space on site. As result, the proposed development would provide a total of five <br />guest parking spaces. <br />Staff notes that the parking enforcement would be the responsibility of the homeowners <br />association and/or the management company for the project. The enforcement measures would <br />be addressed in the CC&Rs. <br />Green Building <br />The applicant has provided the initial Green point checklist, identifying the design elements for <br />the project to meet the Green Building requirements of 50 points. <br />The project is an infill site, benefiting by being in close proximity to many of the services that <br />are considered essential to daily living (convenience grocery shop, child daycare facility, <br />pharmacy, bank, etc.). These factors enable the project to automatically achieve many Green <br />Case No. PUD-71 Planning Commission <br />Page - 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.