My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
041508
>
17 ATTACHMENT 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 1:57:27 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 1:47:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Report, Vineyard Gardens, LLC, Pleasanton, CA HortScience, Inc. <br />December 10, 2007 Page 3 <br />Table 1. Tree condition and frequency of occurrence. Vineyard Gardens, LLC. <br />Pleasanton CA. <br />Common Name Scientific Name <br />Poor Condition <br />Fair <br />Good No. of Trees <br />Heritage <br />Bottlebrush Callistemon citrinus - 1 - 1 - <br />Chinese hackberry Celtis sinensis - - 2 2 - <br />English walnut Jug/ans regia 10 6 -- 16 2 <br />Tobira Pittosporum tobira -- -- 1 1 -- <br />Apricot Prunus armeniaca 1 - - 1 - <br />Almond Prunus dulcis 1 3 2 6 - <br />Black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 1 -- -- 1 1 <br />Coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens -- 1 1 2 2 <br />Total, all trees surveyed 13 11 6 30 <br /> 43% 37% 20% 100% <br />Total, Heritage 5 <br />Suitability for Preservation <br />Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to consider the <br />quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to function well over an <br />extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development sites must be carefully <br />selected to make sure that they may survive development impacts, adapt to a new environment <br />and perform well in the landscape. <br />Our goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long-term health, structural stability and <br />longevity. For trees growing in open fields, away from areas where people and property are <br />present, structural defects and/or poor health presents a low risk of damage or injury if they fail. <br />However, we must be concerned about safety in use areas. Therefore, where development <br />encroaches into existing plantings, we must consider their structural stability as well as their <br />potential to grow and thrive in a new environment. Where development will not occur, the <br />normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be allowed to continue. <br />Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br />^ Tree health <br />Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, demolition <br />of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil compaction than are <br />non-vigorous trees. <br />^ Structural integrity <br />Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot <br />be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where <br />damage to people or property is likely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.