My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
041508
>
17 ATTACHMENT 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 1:57:27 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 1:47:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Report, Vineyard Gardens, LLC, Pleasanton, CA HortScience, Inc. <br />December 10, 2007 Page 1 <br />Introduction and Overview <br />Vineyard Gardens, LLC is planning to develop the site at 3835 Vineyard Avenue in Pleasanton, <br />CA. The project would create a townhome development. Current site use consists of a single <br />family home, outbuildings and an old orchard. The largest portion of the site is orchard which <br />has not been actively maintained for several years. HortScience, Inc. was asked to prepare a <br />Tree Report for the site as part of the application to the City of Pleasanton. The report provides <br />the following information. <br />1. A survey of trees within the proposed project area. <br />2. An evaluation of the condition of each tree. <br />3. An assessment of the impacts of constructing the proposed project on the trees. <br />4. An appraisal of value of each on-site tree. <br />5. Guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction and maintenance <br />phases of development. <br />Survey Methods <br />Trees were surveyed on November 9, 2007. The survey included trees approximately 6" in <br />diameter and greater, located within the proposed project area. Trees located offsite that were <br />either near the proposed project or had canopies extending over the site were included. The <br />survey procedure consisted of the following steps: <br />1. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a map; <br />2. Identifying the tree as to species; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54" above grade; <br />4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 0 - 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, <br />with good structure and form typical of the species. <br />4 -Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural <br />defects that could be corrected. <br />3 -Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of <br />crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with <br />regular care. <br />2 -Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br />branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />7 -Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of <br />foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />0 - Dead. <br />5. Rating the suitability for preservation as "good", "moderate" or "poor". Suitability for <br />preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree, and its <br />potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come. <br />Good: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br />potential for longevity at the site. <br />Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than <br />can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense <br />management and monitoring, and may have shorter life span than <br />those in 'good' category. <br />Poor. Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that cannot <br />be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, regardless of <br />treatment. The species or individual may have characteristics that <br />are undesirable for landscapes, and generally are unsuited for use <br />areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.