My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
040108
>
06 ATTACHMENT 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2008 1:40:11 PM
Creation date
3/26/2008 1:40:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/1/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
06 ATTACHMENT 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
evaluated the tree conditions and recommended the removal of all of the 26 trees located on site, <br />which included two of the heritage sized trees found as "poor suitability for preservation". <br />The proposed landscaping includes a combination of trees and shrubs. The main landscaping <br />feature is the common open area designed in the middle of the development. This open space <br />area includes other amenities such as bench and BBQs for the residents. In addition to the <br />common open space area, avegetated bio-swale is proposed along the east property line, and <br />landscaped islands are proposed at both entrances and at each garage. The proposal appears to <br />meet the minimum requirements. <br />Given the configuration of the site, the landscaping plan does not include many trees as often <br />seen in other developments. Staff finds that the proposed landscaping palette is acceptable, as <br />attentions have been given to the common area. Staff however feels that the two planting <br />"islands" fronts Vineyard Avenue could be enhanced with a combination of accent <br />shrubs/groundcovers/perennials, as they are the entrance to the development. Staff has included <br />a condition of approval to address this item. <br />Traffic <br />The residents in the neighborhood raised the concerns that the existing Vineyard Avenue are <br />impacted by traffic volumes and by speed. They indicated that Vine Street has been used as <br />speed way by many motorists and that the proposed development, with an entrance/exit to Vine <br />Street, would worsen the current situation. Some wanted to see the proposed entrance/exit on <br />Vine Street be removed. <br />The Traffic Engineer initially recommended that Vine Street be the only entrance/exit for the <br />development in order to control vehicular access point onto Vineyard Avenue. Follow-up review <br />of the on-site circulation lead to a recommendation of a two-way driveway for the development <br />that would provide access to both Vineyard Avenue and Vine Street. <br />In terms of traffic volume, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers standard, the trip <br />generation rate for acondominium/townhouse project has a 0.66 AM rate and a 0.83 PM rate. <br />The City Traffic Engineer does not believe that the proposed 10-unit townhouse project would <br />overburden the existing traffic pattern in the area. <br />Additionally, Dowling Associates, one of the City traffic consultants, has created a traffic model <br />for the proposed project, which collected the data for the AM and PM trip distribution for both <br />the existing AM/PM trips and the forecasted trips generated by the project. In review of the <br />collected data, the City Traffic Engineer concluded the that the intersections that would be <br />included in a traffic study have already been studied when the Bernal Commercial Project, <br />Case No. PUD-71 Planning Commission <br />Page - 9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.