My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-88- 49
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC-88- 49
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:35:21 AM
Creation date
3/26/2008 9:27:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/1988
DOCUMENT NO
PC-88- 49
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-88-6, NEG DEC
NOTES
FLOWER REALTY/PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
NOTES 2
PUD REZONING RETAIL COMMERCIAL
NOTES 3
INTERSECTION OF HOPYARD AND OWENS DR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY <br />ALAMEDA COIIN'PY, <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF <br />PREPARED FOR CASE PUD-88-6, <br />FIAWER/REALTY/PRUDENTIAL INS <br />WHEREAS, Flower Realty, Inc. and Prude <br />America have applied for Plan <br />rezoning and development plan <br />story, approximately 2,150 sq <br />structure and related improve <br />approximately 20,000 sq. ft. <br />east corner of the intersecti <br />Owens Drive; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is <br />CF (Commercial Freeway) Distr <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public <br />May 25, 1988, the Planning Coy <br />public testimony, relevant ex <br />of the City staff concerning <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has r~ <br />Initial Study prepared for th <br />ceived the recommendations of <br />PLEASANTON <br />HE NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />APPLICATION OF <br />RANCE COMPANY <br />tial Insurance Company of <br />ed Unit Development <br />approval for a single- <br />ft. retail commercial <br />ents to be located on an <br />ite located at the north- <br />n of Hopyard Road and <br />and; <br />Baring of <br />mission considered all <br />ibits, and recommendations <br />his application; and <br />ceived and reviewed the <br />s application, and re- <br />the staff; and <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held May 25, 1988 at <br />which time the public was giv n the opportunity to <br />comment on the environmental mpacts of the proposed <br />application; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has r viewed the potential <br />impacts in accordance with th applicable state and <br />local guidelines governing th preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmenta Impact Reports; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findsthat the proposal would <br />not have any significant adve se effects on the environ- <br />ment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.