Laserfiche WebLink
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br />The current concepts call for between 330 and 480 ATT units; our forecast includes 450 residences <br />based on the latest communications, but these long-range numbers are still in-flux. The thinking a year <br />ago was for over 1,000, for instance. Another 250 regular (not restricted to seniors) attached units are <br />projected on eastern Busch Road at the end of the forecast period. Also forecast in the next four-to- <br />ten years are an average of just over 70 SFD homes annually on sites concentrated in the south and <br />southeast (including "Lund Ranch", "Sportorno" and "Oak Grove"). Those developments, along with <br />planned seniors housing (on a different site on eastern Busch Road as well as by the EI Charo/I-580 <br />junction), would result in a total number of residences in the city that still does not reach the 29,000- <br />unit cap. Some additional units thus can occur after 2017.18 <br />Concluding Commentarx <br />While fluctuating new housing expectations, especially in Hacienda Business Park, can significantly <br />alter the enrollment projections, the even greater potential forecast differences are in the evolving <br />kindergarten populations. Those totals, of course, have subsequent impacts on all of the remaining <br />grades over time. Your district had rising kindergarten enrollments in the last two years and that was <br />the main source of the deviation from our forecast. We have added to our kindergarten expectations as <br />a result, and these higher kindergarten numbers have created larger overall (K-12) projections. We, <br />nonetheless, are projecting a modest reduction in next year's kindergarten total (i.e., in falling from the <br />current 959 to 915 in October 2008; see Appendix Al on the following page), which may be overly <br />conservative again. We are not saying that another class of 959 kindergartners could not happen next <br />year; it definitely could. But none of the data, including the trends in existing housing, the local birth <br />counts, and the lower new dwellings amounts (compared to past years), let alone the concerns related <br />to the mortgage crisis, indicates a kindergarten of that size for 2008. As we noted earlier, the district <br />should evaluate the kindergarten registration numbers as they become known for the pending school <br />year and adjust the forecast accordingly. <br />Sincerely, <br />~ l~/` . <br />homas R. Williams, Principal Demographer for Enrollment Projection Consultants <br />1e Appreciation for their insights into the planned and potential new housing is again due to Director Jerry Iserson <br />and Principal Planner Janice Stern of the City of Pleasanton Planning & Community Development Department. <br />All final forecast decisions on the timing and amounts, however, were made by this demographer based on the <br />local and broader housing market situations. We should note that these annual projected amounts can differ <br />from the City's for several reasons, including that (1) our forecast is for when the units are first occupied rather <br />than issued building permits, so our totals include additional residences that have already been permitted (and <br />counted against the cap) but not completed, and (2) we are projecting from October 1 to October 1 rather than <br />by calendar years. <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 21 <br />