My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030408
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CCMIN030408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2008 4:31:48 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 4:31:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion: It was m/s by Hosterman/Sullivan to adopt Resolution No. 08-174 denying the appeal, <br />thereby upholding the Planning Commission approval of administrative design review to <br />construct an approximately 64-square-foot first-floor addition to the left side and an <br />approximately 273-square-foot second-floor addition to the right side of the existing residence <br />located at 3496 Whitehall Court; directed staff to initiate an administrative hearing that would <br />result in a fine related to additions not permitted; that remaining work needs to be permitted <br />within 60 days and completed in 6 months. If not completed, the City would take action to initiate <br />a nuisance abatement process, and construction is allowed Monday through Saturdays, with <br />Saturday work to be limited to internal work only. <br />Councilmember McGovern said she would not support the motion and believed Mr. Smith owes <br />an apology to all neighbors. <br />Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: Councilmember McGovern <br />Absent: None <br />15. Consider a status report on and additional funding for the Eastern Alameda County <br />Conservation Strategy <br />Principal Planner Janice Stern gave a status report on the Eastern Alameda County <br />Conservation Strategy, discussed benefits to the City included addressing ecological mitigation, <br />wildlife permitting processes, organizational missions of the County relating to conservation, <br />effective uses of funding. She indicated among other agencies, the City has committed $15,000 <br />to the project, said technical assistance has been provided and Phase I is underway, and <br />proposed is a volunteer regional conservation strategy, which would streamline local project <br />processing and involve local stakeholders. <br />She said the strategy will document important biological resources, it will set priorities for <br />mitigation and conservation, it will include clear standards, set mitigation ratios, and the wildlife <br />agencies will formally approve the plan and provide assurances for those involved. The strategy <br />will take 18 months to develop in three phases, costs are being shared by six agencies, and <br />they expect to get funding from a CalFed grant awarded to the Natural Resources Conservation <br />Service for watershed conservation work. She presented the study area and its boundaries. <br />Mayor Hosterman said approximately 25 people will be invited to participate and she confirmed <br />this would involve land owners, environmental and conservation organizations, developers, and <br />she could provide the Council with a list of participants. <br />Ms. Stern said the first phase includes gathering of information for the baseline data mapping, <br />the second phase includes developing conservation and goals and priorities and a draft <br />conservation strategy; the third phase includes adopting and finalizing the conservation <br />strategy. A joint MOU will commit everyone to the strategy which will be considered for <br />adoption. <br />There is a potential cost savings for the City's CIP projects which would accrue from a <br />streamlined process as well as certainty for project mitigation and it is in line with goals and <br />policies of regional planning sub-element of the 1996 General Plan. They see the advisory <br />group assisting in the development of the strategy, it will consist of technical and non-technical <br />City Council Minutes 9 March 4, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.