CCMIN030408 - Laserfiche WebLink

Robert Leete, appellant, said regarding the timing of the project and the applicant's assertion he has been delayed by appeals, they have been delayed as a result of the applicant's actions as construction has gone on 5-6 years prior to the appeal. He said the neighbors never told Mr. Smith at any time that non-permitted structures were okay; he encouraged the Council to visit the neighborhood as he did not believe there were any 2,700 square foot houses, and felt property values would not be enhanced with a 3,600 square foot home. Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. Councilmember Sullivan questioned what construction had occurred prior to the 2001 permit. Mr. Iserson said there are no permits on file prior to 2001 and he was not aware of any construction. He agreed that it was possible work was done without permits; however, the neighbors would most likely have heard about it. He questioned whether the rest of the construction was done other than the two additions not covered by permits. Mr. Iserson said the interior work cannot be completed because one of the new non-permitted additions is the electrical room and to get wiring from that room, permits must be obtained in order to extend wiring to the rest of the house, but from the exterior point of view, it is very close to being completed. Councilmember Sullivan said if the Council upheld the appeal, he confirmed with Mr. Iserson the work would be removed and he was not sure if this would take longer than finishing what is already built. He questioned the Kings Canyon Court project and confirmed it was a different property owner but that Mr. Smith assisted in the project which took a long time and was permitted. Councilmember McGovern questioned if Mr. Smith applied for permits to the two additions, and Mr. Iserson said he has submitted plans but nothing can be done with them until approved by the Council. Mayor Hosterman acknowledged the neighbor's concerns, believed 6-7 years is too long; however, Mr. Smith tried to accomplish the work on his own and it sounds like it took a lot longer than he thought it would take. She was not in favor of asking him to remove improvements, wished he would have obtained permits ahead of time, agreed the additions are beautiful, is confident staff has conditioned expediting the construction process and she is hopeful that the neighbors most affected will eventually be pleased with the outcome. She encouraged the owner to expedite the process per the City's requirements and discussed a similar situation in her neighborhood and its impact to residents. Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she is sympathetic to the neighbors, recognized construction does take longer than necessary, acknowledged the neighbors want an end to the construction process, did not believe the remedy was to tear down the addition, wished all parties could have addressed the situation in a neighborly fashion and that some repair of the neighborhood relationship occurs in the future. Councilmember Thorne said he is bothered by the progress and completion of the work, believes the remedy is for the City to take an administration action and levy a substantial fine due to Mr. Smith not first obtaining permits, said he did not want to require removal of work and if timelines are not met he would support having the work removed. City Council Minutes 7 March 4, 2008