My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VII. PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br />The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development District and "considerations" to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br />plan. <br />1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare: <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br />public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the <br />installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order <br />to serve the new lots. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br />accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The structures <br />would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, <br />and other applicable City codes. The proposed development is compatible with the <br />adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. <br />Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new structures and the existing <br />structures on the adjacent properties. <br />Therefore, staff believes that the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests <br />of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable <br />specific plan: <br />The Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan was developed to implement the City's <br />General Plan for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor area and has been found by the City <br />Council to be consistent with General Plan policies including densities consistent with <br />surrounding properties, preservation of open space, protection of wildlife habitat, and <br />mitigation of drainage impacts. The proposed PUD development plan has been designed <br />or conditioned to meet the applicable Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan policies <br />for the Hillside Residential and Open Space land use designations. The site will initially <br />be developed with two single-family Hillside Residential lots with six single-family Low <br />Density Residential lots to be developed in the future, consistent with Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan. Additionally, the development would be limited to only a small <br />portion of the site, leaving the majority of land as natural open space. Staff believes that <br />the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Specific Plan, as conditioned. By conforming to the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific <br />Plan, the proposed project also conforms to the General Plan. <br />PUD-32 Page - 22 - November 14, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.