15 ATTACHMENT 9 - Laserfiche WebLink

guest house would be demolished. The Planning Commission took "straw votes" on the following items: • Whether the Specific Plan requires the proposed home to be built precisely on the "blob" shown on the land use plan or whether there was flexibility with respect to interpretation of the Specific Plan. There was consensus that there could be flexibility considered in the siting of the future home and that the proposed home did not need to be located precisely on the "blob "shown on the land use plan, located more or less at the angle point at the easterly and southerly property lines. • Whether the top of the knoll was an appropriate location for a home and whether it was acceptable to locate the proposed home there. Two Commissioners did not feel that the top of the knoll was an appropriate location to build a home. One Commissioner indicated that the top of the knoll was an appropriate location to build a home, but not the proposed home. One Commissioner felt that it would be acceptable to locate a smaller home on the knoll. One Commissioner believed that the top of the knoll was the appropriate place to build the proposed home. • Whether it would be acceptable to build atwo-story home above the 540-foot elevation. Four Commissioners felt that felt that atwo-story house would be acceptable above the 540- foot elevation if it were well designed and designed to reduce its visual impact. One Commissioner felt that the home should be limited to one story as required by the Specific Plan. Whether it would be acceptable to build an approximately 27.5-foot tall home above the 540-foot elevation. There was general consensus that it would be acceptable to allow a slightly taller house if it helped reduce the massing and visual impact of the home. One Commissioner indicated that she would not support the proposed cupola due to concerns with its visual prominence on the hillside site. Other Commissioners felt that the cupola was acceptable since it was not very wide. • Whether the massing and color of the house was acceptable. One Commissioner indicated that she appreciated the toning down of the colors of the house. Another Commissioner believed a little more toning down of the colors and reduction of the massing of the home would be helpful. Two Commissioners indicated that they had a PUD-32 Page - 20 - November 14, 2007