My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plan review process. At the time of the Bordeaux Country Estates PUD review, it was <br />determined that the roads should not connect. <br />Home Site Location <br />The Specific Plan indicates that all HR home sites must be located within the designated <br />development areas as generally depicted on the land use plan. The VACSP Land Use Plan <br />shows a large asterisk indicating the approximate location. These areas are conceptual and not <br />intended to be specific in that at the time that these plans were made it was not connected to or <br />related to topographic constraints. <br />As can be seen on the development plan slope map, most of the site is comprised of slopes <br />greater than 20 percent. Staff believes the home could be located anywhere within the general <br />vicinity of the location shown on the land use plan. Consideration was given to looking at the <br />area closest to the existing home. Staff found that this location would require considerable <br />grading and retaining walls to accommodate the proposed home. Therefore, staff evaluated the <br />proposed location at the top of the knoll and believes with the proposed mitigations, reduction of <br />the aboveground living area, and the proposal to keep a larger area of the original grade up to <br />the home, that this site is preferable. <br />Building Envelopes/Designated Development Areas <br />Staff recommended that building envelopes for both lots be established rather than list minimum <br />property line setbacks as is typically done with standard-sized lots. The proposed building <br />envelopes, identified as Designated Development Areas (DDAs), have been shown on the <br />proposed plans. All structures (i.e., the main dwelling and all accessory structures) would need <br />to be located within these areas. The DDAs generally comply with the minimum property line <br />setbacks noted in the Specific Plan for the HR area, with a few exceptions noted below. <br />The Specific Plan requires a 35-foot minimum front yard setback for HR lots as measured from <br />property lines. The Specific Plan allows building setbacks to be modified through the PUD <br />approval process. The area in front of the existing home is flat and there is limited flat pad area <br />on the one-acre lot. Therefore, the applicants have proposed a 25-foot front setback along the <br />private street of the one-acre lot. The existing home and proposed home will front onto a private <br />street. Staff supports a reduction from 35 feet to 25 feet as proposed. <br />The Specific Plan also requires a 40-foot rear yard setback. Most of the proposed DDA is <br />located 65-feet from the southern property line, but the westernmost portion of the DDA is <br />located 20-feet from the southern property line, near where the future agricultural barn may be <br />located. As noted above, the Specific Plan allows building setbacks to be modified through the <br />PUD approval process. Staff believes that the proposed 20-foot setback to the southern property <br />PUD-32 Page - 9 - November 14, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.