15 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank moved to find that there were no new or changed circumstances or information that would require additional CEQA review of the project and that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; to make the PUD findings as listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of PUD-32, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B, with the following modifications: 1. Modify Condition No. 38 to indicate that in addition to federal holidays, no construction shall be allowed on State holidays and that residents will be notified of any addition to construction hours prior to 8:00 a.m. and past 5:00 p.m., to which they may express their objection and decline the request; 2. Modify Condition No. 17 to add the Tri-Valley Conservancy and the Livermore Agricultural Mitigation Fees as examples of fees which the applicants may need to pay; 3. Add a condition that the applicant will create all applicable open space easements and any other easements required by the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; 4. Modify Condition No. 5 to delete the 2,900-square-foot addition to the existing home on the one-acre lot; 5. Add a condition that the dark retaining wall color will be softened subject to the approval of the Planning Director; and 6. Modify Condition No. 57 to clarify the tree removal process. Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, and Olson. NOES: Commissioners Fox and Pearce. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolution No. PC-2007-48 was entered and adopted as motioned. EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2007 Page 19 of 19