My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
030408
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2008 9:32:07 AM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:32:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION <br />Benefits to the City of Pleasanton. Participation in the preparation of the <br />conservation strategy would benefit Pleasanton through: <br />o Significant cost savings for certain of the City's Capital Improvement Projects <br />accruing from a streamlined environmental review process and greater certainty <br />regarding project mitigation. Projects such as the Bemal Bridge widening at the <br />Arroyo Del Valle have been postponed for several years in an effort to find <br />suitable wetland mitigation areas. While adjacent areas may be suitable they are <br />either under private ownership or owned by other entities unwilling to take on the <br />added responsibility of either creating or officially documenting an environmental <br />mitigation area on their land. The Dublin Canyon Road Bridge replacement <br />project, and future enhancements to Wayside or Delucchi Park that encroach on <br />or affect the adjacent creek or arroyo, are other candidates that may require <br />mitigation measures that are either not readily available or viable in the <br />immediate project area. The inability to provide suitable mitigation measures in a <br />timely manner has, and continues to, increase project construction costs as <br />projects are delayed due to the lack of suitable mitigation areas. <br />o Implementation of the City's General Plan subregional Planning Element goal <br />regarding preserving valuable natural resources and protecting public safety <br />(Goal 2). Policy 3 and Programs 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, address the need to share <br />information about ecological resources and promote a program to preserve them <br />at a subregional level; to promote the development of conservation strategies; <br />and to promote a subregional approach to protection of valuable habitat areas. <br />All of these programs would be implemented by the EACCS project. <br />Status of the Project. Jones & Stokes has made progress on mapping tasks including <br />developing draft land-cover classifications, species selection criteria, and draft wildlife <br />species list. In addition, a public meeting was held in January to solicit interest from <br />agencies, land owners, developers, and conservation organizations to participate in a <br />Users Group which would meet regularly during the strategy development process to <br />review and comment on draft materials and policies. Approximately 25 persons will be <br />invited to participate in this group. <br />Funding of Phases 2 and 3 of the project. As described in the attached Joint <br />Funding and Contract Administration Agreement (Attachment 2), the $15,000 thus far <br />committed by the City of Pleasanton, together with contributions from the other funding <br />partners, is financing Jones & Stokes' work on Phase I (data collection and mapping) of <br />the project. There is currently no funding agreement in place for Phases 2 and 3 <br />although, as noted above, several agencies have made funding commitments. <br />Although work on the EACCS project may proceed beyond Phase I without the City of <br />Pleasanton's financial participation, the City would lose the opportunity to fully <br />participate in shaping the strategy to our needs. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.