Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. <br />The motion passed. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Mr. Long requested that the Planning Commission pose the question to the applicant that upon <br />completion of the work required, there would be no further construction. It had come to his <br />attention that the applicant may modify the bedroom by pushing it out over the main garage. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that the applicant would need to come to the Planning Department <br />for that action. <br />Ms. Decker noted that minor modifications were reviewed by staff if they met all the zoning <br />development standards for straight-zoned property and that they would only go through the <br />Zoning Administrator process. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether it must be performed within <br />the eight-month timeline, Ms. Decker replied that if this project were to be completed and the <br />applicant wished to do further work, that would be considered to be an administrative design <br />review to be brought before the Zoning Administrator. If it fit within the development standards <br />for this zone, then it would be given aseven-day notice. It would be likely that one of the <br />concerned neighbors who had been noticed would request a hearing before the Zoning <br />Administrator and then before the Planning Commission if they were dissatisfied with the <br />Zoning Administrator's decision. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 26, 2007 Page 12 of 12 <br />