My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
020508
>
16 SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2008 2:21:40 PM
Creation date
2/1/2008 2:19:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/5/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 SUPPLEMENTAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~Qata ¢ n <br />~9~~o~~~tion <br />The Pleasanton Heritage Association was asked to review PUD-64. In <br />this review process, the Association utilized the 2002 Downtown Spe- <br />cific Plan and the subsequent 2006 Downtown Design Guidelines. <br />Pleasanton's Downtown Specific Plan and the Downtown Design <br />Guidelines for residential areas stress ... "the importance of reflecting <br />a sense of neighborhood and a pedestrian character that is irreplace- <br />able. Remodels and additions for residential use must be sensitive to <br />Downtown's unique character and scale. If done properly, additions <br />and remodels will look comfortable with the original buildings. New <br />construction needs to be especially sensitive to surrounding <br />structures." <br />PUD-641ocated at 4238 First Street draws on the character of the exist- <br />ing cottage for the theme of the project. The architectural plan for the <br />remodeling of this cottage and the addition of four newly constructed <br />units drew from historic Victorian cottages located in the heart of <br />Pacific Grove, California. <br />The Pleasanton Heritage Association reviewed the details of PUD-64 <br />with thought given to the zoning, lot sizes, building height /density, <br />FAR standards, architectural style, green space /landscaping, color <br />palate, material details, and parking. The plan details submitted for <br />our review provided the opportunity for the following comments: <br />• The specific architectural plans are in keeping with the DSP height <br />and mass recommendations for new construction, <br />• the remodeling of the existing cottage in front is within the DSP <br />Guidelines for that neighborhood and the four new units, <br />• the four new structures vary in size and repeat the same architectural <br />styling, with more detail provided on lots one and five as both are seen <br />directly from the street, <br />• detailed drawings and plans for exterior finish materials were pro- <br />vided and in keeping with the residential architectural style of the that <br />neighborhood, <br />• the color palate was appropriate and varied for each unit to promote <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.