01 MINUTES REGULAR - Laserfiche WebLink

may be issued a hunting license by Fish and Game to deal with a particular animal like a mountain lion from time to time, but these are primarily agricultural areas. City Attorney Roush said on public property, the Municipal Code prohibits falconers to hunt with their bird unless they have permission from the owner or for something in season with the proper license. Councilmember Sullivan said he understood the applicant takes the bird to Livermore to hunt but does not hunt in Pleasanton. Councilmember McGovern said she has totally removed the person, politics and emotion and she was trying to understand what the right thing for wild animals is and what the City should do, and thought hunting is a part of this. Vice Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. Ronald Ellingsen supported approval of the conditional use permit, felt Mayor Hosterman is role model to women, discussed his family's love of hunting, regulations of the sport and falconry, stating there are hundreds of hawks in the area and he has never seen any threatening behavior to humans. Chris Beratlis felt the matter has gotten out of hand and is politically motivated. He said he has never heard of attacks in Pleasanton, he has hawks living 100 feet from his home and they have never harmed any of his baby Iambs, thinks it is a proper use for the area and is a good human cause. Bill Rose said he has been a bird watcher and Audubon Society member for many years, supported the use permit, thinks the matter is politically motivated, cited dog biting as a larger problem, said hawks capture animals for food and rare attacks are due to being provoked, which is not documented. Dan Carl asked the Council to focus on the matter being a violation of the Municipal Code, questioned its enforcement and policy of allowing residents to hunt and kill animals in a residential neighborhood, cited known and documented attacks, questioned the City's liability and voiced concern that an elected official may receive preferential treatment, precedence and asked the Council to support the Planning Commission's decision. Elizabeth Thompson supported depersonalizing the issue, urged the Council to grant the conditional use permit, said fair treatment has been afforded and knows Falconry is highly regulated. She cited constitutional rights and democracy, political motivation, and asked the Council to consider amendment of the definition of "fowl" or create an exotic animal ordinance. Kay Ayala asked the Council to depersonalize the matter, questioned whether they would want an exotic pet living next door to them, felt the matter would set precedence and questioned if it would be better for Mayor Hosterman to withdraw her appeal. Steve Brozosky said Webster dictionaries typically uses the most archaic version of a definition first, never saw a hawk fitting the definition of fowl and spoke of the precedent of fowl under the Happy Valley Specific Plan's page 29 and the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan's page 44. He asked the Council to depersonalize the matter and felt there were many more projects staff should work on other than an exotic animal ordinance. City Council Minutes 9 January 15, 2008