Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Pearce noted that with respect to the discussion on gated communities on page 35, <br />she believed there was a majority of Commissioners that wanted to change the word to <br />“prohibit,” but there was no bullet to indicate that. She requested that staff look into that matter. <br />Ms. Decker noted that staff would do so. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the first sentence of the first full paragraph on page 6 should be <br />modified to read as follows: “In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding who <br />monitored the number of people who lived in the house.” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that with respect to the City’s options mentioned in the third full <br />paragraph of page 6, she had mentioned that design reviews had been performed after the fact for <br />items as a result of complaints about its appearance, such as the large play structure in <br />Foxbrough Estates. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker believed she had seen it in the Minutes. Commissioner Narum noted that it was <br />mentioned in the last paragraph of page 8. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox inquired why that discussion had taken place under “Traffic Safety Study.” <br />Ms. Decker replied that the public hearing had been closed, and there had been discussion about <br />that subject at that time. She noted that the Minutes reflected discussion in the chronological <br />order in which it took place, and there was a great deal of discussion on a variety of topics. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank did not believe that the “Traffic Safety Study” subheading was intended to <br />address all the discussion that followed. Ms. Decker noted that the header would be removed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox believed that Commissioner Narum had discussed what types of projects for <br />design review would be brought forward and that she did not see that discussion in the Minutes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that it was discussed second-to-last paragraph on page 6 (“She did <br />not believe this building was visually acceptable and suggested that it be the subject of an <br />agendized discussion.”) and was included in the motion under Matters Initiated by Commission <br />Members on page 7 (“Commissioner Blank moved to agendize an item to discuss changes to the <br />Code that may encompass additional design review for structures or enlargements into front yard <br />areas.”) <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum moved to approve the Minutes as amended. <br />Commissioner Blank seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2007 Page 2 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />