My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
012908
>
04 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2008 4:56:38 PM
Creation date
1/23/2008 4:51:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/29/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04 ATTACHMENT 3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 3. Circulation Element <br />Table 3-7 illustrates the existing and buildout levels of service for the signalized intersections in <br />Pleasanton. As Pleasanton approaches buildout, the congestion levels, especially near the freeways, <br />a=unroach the acceptable limits identified as LOS D. Figure 3-5 shows existing levels of service while <br />Figure 3-6 shows buildout levels of service with additional mitigations. At buildout, except for <br />exempted Downtown and gateway intersections the entire city would operate at level of service D or <br />better with all mitigation measures implemented, as detailed in Table 3-8 and Figure 3-7. <br />Traffic Safety <br />On an ongoing basis, the Traffic Engineering Division in consultation with the Police Department <br />monitors collision trends in Pleasanton. The City annually ranks intersections based on collision <br />freduency and identifies intersections with the highest number of collisions for more detailed analysis <br />of collision causes and possible solutions. Efforts to reduce congestion and calm traffic also help to <br />reduce collision-risk factors such as speeding and red-light running <br />In addition to monitoring the existing roadway network's traffic safety, traffic studies for new <br />development should also address roadway safety. Project traffic studies should address necessary <br />improvements to network traffic safety as well as to pedestrian, bicycle, and existing local roadway <br />safety needs. Traffic safety analyses should address project impacts with mitigation and improvement <br />measures. These measures should focus on the arterial network's level of service improvements as <br />well as on general roadway saw <br />For traffic safety the City has established minimum roadway right-of--way widths -including sidewalks, <br />parking, landscaping, and bicycle lanes - ranging from 30 feet for alleys to 166 feet for thoroughfares <br />with frontage roads. According to the Municipal Code, new residential roadway rights-of--way <br />should be between 42 and 60 feet wide, depending on roadway type.3 During the Planned Unit <br />Development~rocess, the City may approve narrower roadways, if these would provide more safety <br />for pedestrians while still providing adeduate bicycle and motor vehicle access. <br />Future Conditions <br />Traffic Projection Model <br />In order to forecast General Plan buildout traffic volumes and Llevels of service, the City of <br />Pleasanton has developed a comprehensive traffic forecasting model. Summarized briefly, the model <br />utilizes information regarding the city's existing and future land uses as well as the existing and future <br />roadway network to project traffic volumes and the performance of major intersections within the city. <br />3 Pleaaantan Munici~ad Code. 19.36.040 Streets and thoroughfares -Width and geometries 2007. <br />Circulation Element 012908 redline 3-14 City Council Ol 29 OS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.