Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT 3. Circulation Element <br />Peak periods atypically <br />constitute eight to twelve percent of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume, as listed on Table 3-65._l~ <br />~~e is-e~rlled~e~e~ elseā‚¬~e~ice~xe~ete~~ed c ~~-- ~'-~ "~r' ~ ~. Table 3-3~, <br />above, defines the range of levels of service and describes the resulting effects on traffic congestion. <br />As can be seen from Table 3-65, the largest volumeb~s~iest roadway segments in Pleasanton awe <br />are on the major arterials approaching the interstate freeway system. Figure 3-3 and <br />Figure 3-4 show existing morning and evening peak-hour traffic volumes, respectively. ~~3 <br />Appro~ately 80 percent of Pleasanton jobs are performed by workers who reside outside of <br />Pleasanton. Conversely, approximately 705 percent of Pleasanton residents work outside of <br />Pleasanton. This dynamic results in the majority of Pleasanton's workforce <br />leaving the City in the morning, and being replaced by the working~opulation. This is reversed in the <br />afternoon commute, creating significant trips on the arterial system going to and from the freeways. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In addition_ to. morning and evening Weak commute hours. the Citv of Pleasanton has aschool-related <br />commute that adds to traffic congestion. In the morning, the "school peak" coincides with the <br />morning commute peak creating additional congestion on the local roadway system. The afternoon <br />"school peak" is less extensive because ~~'-~~' °~1~-~~ ~~-~~ °°-- ~~°~---~~-' °~a the 3 n.m. release time <br />does not coincide with the evening commute peak. <br />2 City of Pleasanton 2006 Employee and Resident Transportation Survey, November 2006 <br />Circulation Element 012908 redline 3- ~ ~ City Council Oi 29 08 <br />