My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
012908
>
04 ATTACHMENT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2008 4:55:21 PM
Creation date
1/23/2008 4:48:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/29/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04 ATTACHMENT 2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 3. Circulation Element <br />In addition to morning and evening peak commute hours, the City of Pleasanton has aschool-related <br />commute that adds to traffic congestion. In the morning, the "school peak" coincides with the <br />morning commute peak creating additional congestion on the local roadway system. The afternoon <br />"school peak" is less extensive because the 3 p.m. release time does not coincide with the evening <br />commute peak. <br />Table 3-7 illustrates the existing and buildout levels of service for the signalized intersections in <br />Pleasanton. As Pleasanton approaches buildout, the congestion levels, especially near the freeways, <br />approach the acceptable limits identified as LOS D. Figure 3-5 shows existing levels of service while <br />Figure 3-6 shows buildout levels of service with additional mitigations. At buildout, except for <br />exempted Downtown and gateway intersections, the entire city would operate at level of service D or <br />better with all mitigation measures implemented, as detailed in Table 3-8 and Figure 3-7. <br />Traffic Safety <br />On an ongoing basis, the Traffic Engineering Division in consultation with the Police Department <br />monitors collision trends in Pleasanton. The Ciry annually ranks intersections based on collision <br />frequency and identifies intersections with the highest number of collisions for more detailed analysis <br />of collision causes and possible solutions. Efforts to reduce congestion and calm traffic also help to <br />reduce collision-risk factors such as speeding and red-light n,nning. <br />In addition to monitoring the existing roadway network's traffic safety, traffic studies for new <br />development should also address roadway safety. Project traffic studies should address necessary <br />improvements to network traffic safety as well as to pedestrian, bicycle, and existing local roadway <br />safety needs. Traffic safety analyses should address project impacts with mitigation and improvement <br />measures. These measures should focus on the arterial network's level of service improvements as <br />well as on general roadway safety. <br />For traffic safety the City has established minimum roadway right-of--way widths -including sidewalks, <br />parking, landscaping, and bicycle lanes -ranging from 30 feet for alleys to 166 feet for thoroughfares <br />with frontage roads. According to the Municipal Code, new residential roadway rights-of--way should <br />be between 42 and 60 feet wide, depending on roadway type.3 During the Planned Unit Development <br />process, the City may approve narrower roadways, if these would provide more safety fox pedestrians <br />while still providing adequate bicycle and motor vehicle access. <br />3 Pleasanton Municipal Code, 19.36.040 Streets and thoroughfares -Width and geometrics, 2007. <br />Circulation Element 012908 clean 3-17 City Council 012909 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.