My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 04(A)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
011508
>
18 ATTACHMENT 04(A)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:05:17 PM
Creation date
1/15/2008 10:30:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 04(A)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Harryman replied that disbanding an HOA was not an uncommon occurrence and that the <br />dues would not have to be paid. She noted, however, that the CC&R's would still be binding. <br />She added that when the City approves a project, she looks at the CC&R's and if there were <br />maintenance responsibilities, the HOA would have to notify the City prior to disbanding. <br />Ms. Decker noted that an email from Chairperson Fox was placed on the dais, requesting <br />clarification on several points. With respect to the required floor area for the enclosure ("mew"), <br />she noted that State Department of Fish & Game publication stated that it should be a minimum <br />of 64 square feet, and have a minimum interior ceiling height of seven feet throughout. She <br />noted that the document detailed the dimensions of the mew as well as the required equipment <br />and stated that the enclosure must have adequate ventilation as well. Staff displayed a slide of <br />the interior of the mew which delineated the interior height of the structure. Ms. Decker noted <br />that federal or State agents inspected the enclosures and that they would perform any necessary <br />enforcement actions. She believed the site had been inspected and that it conformed to the <br />necessary regulations. <br />Ms. Decker then described the body of articles attached to the staff report regarding hawk attacks <br />and noted that one article cited a park in New York was using hawks to clear pigeons and that <br />while one small dog had been plucked from the shrubs by the hawk, the dog was rushed to the <br />veterinarian and treated for minor injuries. She noted that the account noted that the introduction <br />of the hawks into the park was successful in clearing out the pigeons; it seemed the program had <br />continued. She noted that other articles indicated attacks may have occurred due to the <br />proximity of the nesting areas and how hawks are naturally in surrounding areas. She also noted <br />that many attacks were to pigeons on the East Coast and Southern California which were <br />reported by pigeon fanciers. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if the New York incident involved a falcon or a hawk. <br />Ms. Decker replied that it was a hawk and not a peregrine falcon. She added that falconry uses <br />various types of hawks. <br />Chairperson Fox inquired whether there was a difference between a hawk and a falcon and <br />whether a hawk is a subspecies of a falcon. Ms. Decker indicated that staff did not know all of <br />the differences between the two. <br />Commissioner Blank indicated that he had done some research in that area and noted that the <br />red-tailed hawk belonged to the family known as falconiformes, which indicated that it generally <br />killed its prey with its beak. Commissioner Blank indicated that he had more information to <br />share in relation to another email. <br />Ms. Decker noted the Commission asked whether the appropriate license had been obtained <br />when the hawk was trapped and indicated staff did not have a copy of the license going back that <br />faz in the December 2005 time frame to know whether a license was obtained. Staff believes that <br />the permit might have been obtained appropriately. <br />Ms. Decker noted that with regard to transport or handling, the dog leash laws required dogs to <br />be leashed while outside the owner's property. In addition, the Pleasanton Municipal Code did <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2007 Page 3 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.