My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110607
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
CCMIN110607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2007 5:07:13 PM
Creation date
12/7/2007 5:05:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NAME
CCMIN110607
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
like on Pleasanton's ridges and asked the Council to come up with a plan that has smaller <br />homes and less impact. <br />Karla Brown said the development can approve homes up to 12,000 square feet, distributed <br />photographs of what a Piedmont 10,500 square foot home looked like, a 8,847 square foot <br />home on 20 acres of wine grapes on Vineyard which resembles a village, and the cut plan from <br />the Planning Commission showing that 7,000 cubic yards of dirt will be removed in the project. <br />The red zone for Lot 39 cuts 43 feet off the top of the ridgeline, which is like afour-story <br />building. Lots 16 and 17 are almost all fill which will cause many cracks to the houses, and she <br />presented pictures of what the area looks like now and said it should stay this way. <br />Kay Ayala asked the Council to deny the second reading of the project because the citizens <br />who spoke did their own research, met with staff and presented new information tonight on the <br />environment which is of major importance regarding the native plant habitat that was <br />overlooked. She hoped the scientific community and the public will have the opportunity to <br />further review and work with the developer and city to reduce the grading impacts on native <br />plant species as the planning process continues, which she felt needed to be done first prior to <br />approving the project. Secondly, the process set up left out the communities of Vintage Hills, <br />Grey Eagle and Ruby Hill. She felt story poles should have been put up. She said the <br />developer agreement has been engineered so that if the PUD is subject to referendum, then the <br />agreement still stands. If the development agreement is subject to referendum then the open <br />space would not be in place. She asked Council to not approve the ordinances without putting <br />in language in both the development agreement and PUD that negate each other if one is <br />subject to a referendum. She said they plan a referendum on the PUD. <br />David Stark said over 20 years ago, the Council made a visionary decision that was also subject <br />to a referendum. The Hacienda Business Park is now celebrating its 25~' anniversary and he felt <br />there were many benefits as a result. He asked the Council to support the Oak Grove <br />development, urged the community to support it as well as he felt the benefits were manifold, <br />and creating the recreation opportunity could not be bypassed. <br />Debra Wahl, Trails Ad Hoc Committee member, said she was in support of the Oak Grove <br />project, felt it was a good compromise and unique opportunity for the City in the 496 acres of <br />open space and trails. She said if not done, the space will be accessible to no one, and no one <br />knows what will come back if not approved. <br />Jerry Pentin, said he has been involved in various committees and commissions, said he knows <br />the initiative and referendum will pit neighbor against neighbor and friend against friend, and <br />said the issue is to keep their park. He felt there are those who will attempt to deny them of the <br />park, said a group of residents have chosen not to let this happen and they are willing to <br />educate residents to understand both sides of the issue. When properly informed, they will <br />decline to sign any initiative or referendum concerning Oak Grove. Their committee, Keep Our <br />Park, can be viewed online. He felt safeguards are in place to protect ridges and view sheds, <br />he doubts the mega-mansions could come to the Planning Commission and Council and pass <br />with the examples seen, and he believed that if the initiative or referendum passed the <br />opportunity to keep this open space may vanish which would be completely out of character. <br />Mayor Hosterman asked Fire Chief Cody to speak on fire dangers in the hills. Fire Chief Cody <br />said they evaluated the property's access, unique routes, the need for emergency vehicle <br />access and evacuation routes for those living within the community. They measured these <br />against the mitigation measures required and arrived at sprinkling buildings, defensible space, <br />modeling the fuel for grasslands based on how fires behave, and the Fire Department <br />City Council Minutes 8 November 6, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.