My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 ATTACHMENT 13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
120407
>
21 ATTACHMENT 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2007 1:06:38 PM
Creation date
11/29/2007 12:46:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
21 ATTACHMENT 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONFII)i~;.\'I'IAI. & YR:IIIII,I~GL~I) <br />~!~-ORii PRQI)L'CT <br />Regency Centers -Pleasanton <br />Fiscal Analysis Memo <br />October 8, 2007 <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />City's projection of $20,000 in business license tax is close to Kosmont's <br />estimation of $22,120 based on 0.03% of annual gross receipts from the Project's <br />retailers. The difference stems from the PSF sales approximations used for <br />various retail users (See Appendix D). <br />Finding #2: City Expenditures from Proiect <br />Kosmont estimates a range of fiscal expenditures incurred by the Project within a <br />range of $115,000 to $193,500 by utilizing two methodologies: 1) increase of full- <br />time equivalent City employees needed to manage expected service demand <br />increases and 2) an incremental equation of $1 service cost increase per 1 SF of <br />new retail development. Consultant used the same methodologies as the City <br />Analysis to calculate fiscal expenditures. <br />However, based on experience analyzing comparable retail developments in other <br />cities and their relative self-sufficiency, Kosmont believes the fiscal expenditure <br />impact will be closer to the lower end of the range at $115,000. Projects such as <br />that being proposed are considered institutional quality because they are located <br />in superior markets and are typically anchored by national credit tenants who <br />contribute to a common area maintenance program (CAM), which in turn <br />provides services related to safety and maintenance, disposal and other services. <br />Either alternatively or as an augmentation to basic CAM services, certain stores <br />within a center will hire directly for special services as related to safety <br />patrol/internal security and maintenance of the store specific property conditions. <br />As a result, tenants of such centers tend not to be intense users of city services, <br />and a city's out-of-pocket costs related to services provided are more than likely <br />to fall in the lower range of the spectrum. <br />Finding 3: Net Fiscal Impact <br />Kosmont estimates a net fiscal impact for the Project of between $631,740 and <br />$710,200. This varies from the City's range of $300,000 to $375,000 based on <br />differences in estimated PSF sales used for the Project retailers and the amount of <br />discount applied to account for overlapping sales. Property tax estimates were <br />also different since the City used an assessed Project value of $38.1 million. <br />Regency's detailed pro forma now estimates assessed value of $48.1 million <br />resulting in approximately $25,100 of additional property tax for Pleasanton. <br />Tn+s aratyaK to for atuWative pwposea ana ra rqt a gwraMee d sGUal anNer tonne renlla. Project Vro rom+a antl tax anatysea aro I <br />- propctbru omy. Actual rau%a may d~1Aer maleruMy from 4+oae errWe++eA ii a4a anayaa. 1{ <br />kosman 18501 vennrca tea. Suite 811 Etrcino Ca6lomie 91 s]6 oha+e.991.a+s~ fez 818,981.8888 www,koertwM.tam <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.