Laserfiche WebLink
wasteful in terms of paper and energy and other natural resources as well as annoying in the <br />mailers, the newspapers and telephone calls. He enjoys sign-waving on the corners, the socials <br />held throughout the town and urged the Council to consider looking at individual contribution <br />limits and individual expenditure committee limits. He liked the voluntary expenditure pledge, <br />which might be a good first step to take and looks forward to hearing more discussion on the <br />matter. <br />Kathy Dowding said in the interest of keeping elections clean, she felt it is imperative to <br />implement voluntary spending limits and asked to find a way to monitor these. She asked for a <br />limit and full disclosure of all contributions and supported keeping the limit at the $25 level. <br />Marjorie Muentz supported contribution limits, expenditure limits, and transparency. <br />Tom Pico said it has not been until the last couple of elections where large monetary <br />contributions have come in and where PACs were being formed and active in terms of making <br />the independent campaign contributions and expenditures. He felt the City should focus on the <br />direct contributions and expenditures as it's hopeless to think about controlling about <br />independent campaign expenditures of the PACs because they operate under different law. He <br />suggested that the focus be on disclosure and asked that Council not mess with the $25 limit or <br />set a cap on expenditures because it gives further advantage to the PACs because they do not <br />have any caps on what they can spend, however if a contribution limit is needed, set something <br />easy to manage, easy to control and use the State limits for assembly campaigns which are <br />reasonable. <br />Mayor Hosterman called for a break at 9:16 p.m. and reconvened the regular meeting at 9:22 <br />p.m. <br />Councilmember Thorne felt the discussion was great, said all five Councilmembers are eligible <br />to run for re-election when their current terms are up as incumbents, said he wanted to be <br />cautious in that campaign finance limitations did tend to favor incumbents; therefore the City <br />should be cautious in how it limits campaign finances. The nature of the job provides <br />Councilmembers with opportunities for invitations to meetings, lunches, dinners, and there is an <br />advantage of being an incumbent. In some cities where there are campaign limitations, if you <br />look and see how many times an incumbent has run un-opposed, it is much larger and much <br />more frequent in Pleasanton. Regarding controlling the amount of money a candidate can get, <br />he cautioned that there are certain things that cannot be limited. He said he has been a <br />recipient of campaign expenditures, it is an odd feeling when you get a piece of mail which is <br />about you and you did not even know it was coming. He felt there is a place in the political <br />process for independent expenditures but limiting the amount of money a candidate can raise in <br />a campaign would severely limit or switch some of the money over to independent expenditures. <br />He said another occurrence seen is that the campaigns will build up a debt and after the <br />election is over, the candidate writes a check to their own campaign and that is how they retire <br />their debt. He said he does believe in transparent reporting and hoped the Council looks into <br />online reporting. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked if there was any way of limiting PAC funding and independent <br />funding contributions to candidates in elections. Ms. Soto said there could be a situation where <br />you limited their contributions, but you cannot limit their overall expenditures. <br />Councilmember McGovern said she was interested in limiting contributions, thinks the <br />community needs to be cognizant of the independent and PAC money that comes to <br />City Council Minutes 9 October 16, 2007 <br />