Laserfiche WebLink
Folsom Dam was completed in 1955 and provides a total storage capacity of <br />1,OlD,POD AF and a safe yield of approximately 590,000 AF. To date, the Bureau <br />has executed only two contracts for the delivery of water via the Fol som-So,sth <br />canal--EBMUD's contract for 15D,O00 AFA and a second contract with the <br />Sacramento Municipal Utility District for delivery of up 75,0OO AFA for the <br />Rancho Seco nuclear power plant. <br /> <br />At present, most water that is stored in Folsom Reservoir is released to the <br />lower American River and substantially enhances the summer flow. As shown on <br />Figure 2 above, the average summer flow is 1,500 cfs. The Bureau intends to <br />sign contracts for the delivery of up to 590,000 AFA of water. All or DOrti,~nS <br />of this water could be diverted to the Polsom-South canal. This would <br />the average summer flow to about 1,00O cfs. <br /> <br />In 1955, the Board adopted a decision (D-8.q3) approving the Bureau's a~prt~i~.- <br />tion of water at Folsom Dam. D-893 requires that the Bureau provide a <br />flow in the lower American River during the summer period of 250 cfs (i.e., <br />average flow that existing in the summer months prior to construction of Folsom <br />Dam). Thus, the Bureau could divert additional water through the Folsom-So!jt~ <br />Canal and reduce the summer flow in the river to 250 cfs. <br /> <br />In 1970, the State Board adopted a decision (D-1400) which relates to the <br /> <br />operation of Auburn Dam. The decision would require instream flows of R00 o <br /> <br />1500 cfs during summer months. Since Auburn dan has not been constructed, _ <br />however, the Bureau is only obligated to maintain the minimum instream flow <br /> <br />250 cfs as specified in D-8.q3. <br /> <br />In addition, future inbasin developne_nt coupled with the possible diversion <br /> <br />water by the Bureau to the Folsom-South Canal will reduce the level of flo~J in <br /> <br /> <br />