My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1962
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1901 - 2000
>
ORD 1962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:23:47 PM
Creation date
11/7/2007 2:43:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1962
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit to <br />Ordinance No. 1962 <br />compensation shall include only compensation paid to counsel not otherwise <br />employed as City staff and shall exclude, without limitation, City Attorney <br />time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and normal day- <br />to-day business expenses incurred by City. Developer's obligation to pay <br />for legal counsel shall not extend to fees incurred on appeal unless otherwise <br />authorized by Developer. In the event City and Developer are unable to <br />select mutually agreeable legal counsel to defend such action or proceeding, <br />each party may select its own legal counsel at its own expense. <br />(b) The parties agree that this Section 9.01 shall constitute a separate agreement <br />entered into concurrently, and that if any other provision of this Agreement, <br />or the Agreement as a whole, is invalidated, rendered null, or set aside by a <br />court of competent jurisdiction, the parties agree to be bound by the terms of <br />this section, which shall survive such invalidation, nullification or setting <br />aside. <br />Section 9.02. Cure; Reapproval. <br />(a) If, as a result of any administrative, legal or equitable action or other <br />proceeding as described in Section 10.06, all or any portion of this <br />Agreement, Project Approvals, or Subsequent Approvals are set aside or <br />otherwise made ineffective by any judgment (a "Judgment") in such action <br />or proceeding (based on procedural, substantive or other deficiencies, <br />hereinafter "Deficiencies"), the parties agree to use their respective best <br />efforts to sustain and reenact or readopt this Agreement, Project Approvals, <br />and/or Subsequent Approvals that the Deficiencies related to, as follows, <br />unless the Parties mutually agree in writing to act otherwise: <br />(i) If any Judgment requires reconsideration or consideration by City of <br />this Agreement, Project Approval, or Subsequent Approval, then the <br />City shall consider or reconsider that matter in a manner consistent with <br />the intent of this Agreement. If any such Judgment invalidates or <br />otherwise makes ineffective all or any portion of this Agreement, <br />Project Approval, or Subsequent Approval, then the Parties shall <br />cooperate and shall cure any Deficiencies identified in the Judgment or <br />upon which the Judgment is based in a manner consistent with the <br />intent of this Agreement. City shall then readopt or reenact this <br />Agreement, Project Approval, Subsequent Approval, or any portion <br />thereof, to which the Deficiencies related. <br />(ii) Acting in a manner consistent with the intent of this Agreement <br />includes, but is not limited to, recognizing that the Parties intend that <br />Developer may develop the Project, and adopting such ordinances, <br />resolutions, and other enactments, including but not limited to a PUD <br />Development Plan, as are necessary to readopt or reenact all or any <br />portion of this Agreement, Project Approvals, and/or Subsequent <br />Approvals without contravening the Judgment. <br />54393\84008v3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.