My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1962
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1901 - 2000
>
ORD 1962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:23:47 PM
Creation date
11/7/2007 2:43:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1962
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit to <br />Ordinance No. 1962 <br />parties' desire to avoid that result by acknowledging that Developer shall <br />have the right to develop the Project in such order and at such rate and at <br />such times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its <br />subjective business judgment. <br />(c) Nothing in this Agreement shall exempt Developer from completing work <br />required by a subdivision agreement, road improvement agreement or <br />similar agreement in accordance with the terms thereof. <br />Section 6.11. Exempting Fees Imposed by Outside Agencies. The City agrees to <br />exclude Developer from any and all collection agreements regarding fees, <br />including, but not limited to, development impact fees, which other public <br />agencies request the City to impose at City's discretion on the Project or the <br />Project Site after the Effective Date through the Term of this Agreement. This <br />section shall not prohibit the City from imposing on Developer any fee or <br />obligation that is imposed by a regional agency in accordance with state or <br />federal obligations and implemented by the City in cooperation with such <br />regional agency. <br />Section 6.12. Fee Reductions or Credits. The parties intent that the fees described in <br />Section 3.02 will be in lieu of any exactions, taxes or assessments generally <br />intended to address similar uses or purposes, and that Developer shall not be <br />required to pay two times for any such exaction, fee or assessment. Accordingly, <br />the fees described in Section 3.02 shall be subject to reductions/credits in an <br />amount equal to Developer's actual cost of complying with any such lawfully <br />imposed exaction, tax, or assessment generally intended to address similar uses <br />or purposes, whether imposed on the Project, the Project Site, the Project <br />Approvals or the Subsequent Approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such <br />reduction/credit shall be provided as a result of any assessment that arises from <br />an assessment district requested by Developer under Section 5.07. <br />ARTICLE 7. AMENDMENT <br />Section 7.01. To the extent permitted by state and federal law, any Project Approval <br />or Subsequent Approval may, from time to time, be amended or modified in the <br />following manner: <br />(a) Administrative Project Amendments. Upon the written request of Developer <br />for an amendment or modification to a Project Approval or Subsequent <br />Approval, the Director of Planning and Community Development or his/her <br />designee shall determine: (i) whether the requested amendment or <br />modification is minor when considered in light of the Project as a whole; and <br />(ii) whether the requested amendment or modification is consistent with this <br />Agreement and Applicable Law. If the Director of Planning and Community <br />Development or his/her designee finds that the proposed amendment or <br />modification is minor, consistent with this Agreement and Applicable Law, <br />and will result in no new significant impacts not addressed and mitigated in <br />54393\84008v3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.