My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 07153
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
RES 07153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2007 1:07:26 PM
Creation date
11/2/2007 1:06:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 07153
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit B-5 <br />FINAL MITIGATION MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN <br />PUD-33, OAK GROVE DEVELOPMENT/LIN PROPERTY <br />City Council on October 2, 2007 <br />INTRODUCTION <br />The Oak Grove Planned Unit Development (PUD-33) is a residential/open space devel- <br />opment on a portion of a 562-acre site located in south Pleasanton. The City is the lead <br />agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has prepared an Envi- <br />ronmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project. <br />The original project addressed by the Final EIR was a 98-unit subdivision; one transporta- <br />tion alternative and three land use altematives were also addressed. The City selected <br />"Alternative 4," one of the land use alternatives, as the project to be considered for ap- <br />proval. Alternative 4, which the Final EIR identifies as the "Environmentally SuperiorAlter- <br />native" (DEIR pp. S15-16), is a 51-unit subdivision on approximately 66.73 acres (77.13 <br />acres including streets, drives, and graded areas) with 496 acres set aside as permanent <br />open space dedicated to the City. The EIR found that this alternative would have generally <br />the same types of CEQA impacts as the original project but that this alternative's pre- <br />mitigation impacts would be reduced in comparison to the original- project, as a result of the <br />diminished number of lots, or changes in the project's development footprint, or both. <br />When a lead agency approves a project that it has found to have the potential to result in <br />one or more significant impacts, it adopts mitigation measures in the form of changes or <br />alterations incorporated into the project that would avoid or substantially lessen those im- <br />pacts. Generally, the mitigation measures are put into effect by enforcement of permit <br />conditions, agreements, or other instruments. In the case of Oak Grove, for impacts of the <br />original project that would remain significant under Alternative 4, the mitigation measures <br />and implementation mechanisms parallel those of the original project. <br />The lead agency is required by California law (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6) to <br />adopt a reporting or monitoring program to ensure that the mitigation measures are im- <br />plemented. Monitoring provides for ongoing project oversight to ensue that project com- <br />pliance is checked on a regular basis during (and, if necessary, continuing after) compli- <br />ance. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(c)). <br />The Mitigation Monitoring and Implementation Plan (MMIP) presented in the following ta- <br />ble addresses the specific topic areas discussed in the environmental impact report for this <br />project. Each mitigation measure is identified and the location of the full discussion of the <br />City Council on October 2, 2007 Page 1 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.