My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01.3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
110607
>
01.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2007 3:04:10 PM
Creation date
11/1/2007 1:33:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01.3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Sullivan said he would like to look at caps on contributions from individuals, <br />PACs, and other committees. Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she was in favor of looking at a <br />voluntary expenditure total, but she would rather see as an individual an amount that is coming <br />from a corporation where she could choose to say she does not want to accept it. <br />Based on the collective discussion of the City Council, City Manager Fialho said staff will return <br />in December with options for council consideration. <br />16. Review of potential costs and procedures required to establish railroad quiet zones at <br />grade train crossings <br />Public Works Director Rob Wilson said the item before the Council is to review costs and <br />procedures required to establish railroad quiet zone at grade crossings. He said the quiet zones <br />were created with the possibility for it in 2005, but the Federal Railroad Administration adopted a <br />new train horn rule which allowed the possibility of creating a quiet zone where a train is <br />prohibited from blowing its whistle. The City has four at-grade crossings in the downtown area; <br />at Santa Rita Road, St. Mary's Street, Rose Street and West Angela Street and all crossings are <br />currently controlled by crossing arms. He said the blowing of the horn is considered to be a <br />safety measure; it warns pedestrians as well as drivers that a train is coming in addition to the <br />visual sign that the gate is coming down. The understanding is that if you stop the whistle from <br />blowing, that it be replaced with something that creates at least as safe a crossing as if a train <br />came in blowing its horn. When creating a quiet zone, there is a calculator used on site that <br />allows one to look at alternatives to the existing protection. Staff has gone on that site, reviewed <br />what could be done for an alternative and the recommendation on the site itself is to create a <br />four quadrant gate system. The four quadrant gate is a fairly expensive option because the <br />work is done by the Union Pacific Railroad employees who owns the tracks and makes sure the <br />work is done to their satisfaction. There is a need to put in some type of detection to allow the <br />gates to come up should a car get trapped within those four gates. There must be a backup <br />system as well in case the power goes out which indicates to the conductor to blow the horn, <br />and all of these factors add up to significant cost. Overall, staff feels this would provide benefits <br />to the residents, especially those living next to the railroads. It stops the horn from blowing <br />except for those ACE trains approaching the one station. Federal regulations require that a train <br />entering a station must blow a whistle. The trade-off for those benefits is the budget for it. If <br />$400,000 is multiplied by four intersections, it would cost $1.6 million just for the downtown. In <br />addition, there was a speaker who was looking at the at-grade crossing at Castlewood. <br />Castlewood Drive is an at-grade crossing located in the County, but the blowing of the horn <br />does affect Pleasanton residents. If adding this intersection, it would be another $400,000. <br />Staff is recommending that because of the benefits, that the Council consider this, but in the <br />overall context of other priorities that the Council is currently looking at. There are other projects <br />coming forward that may need additional dollars. Therefore, staff recommends Council take the <br />action of considering this with next year's update of the CIP. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she lives near a crossing and they hear the whistle and <br />understands those who came to the Council are truly bothered by it. She asked if staff knew <br />how many people are affected and think that $400,000 was a good way to spend City funds. <br />She questioned if there was a way to measure this. Mr. Wilson said staff has not done this, they <br />have gone out and talked to residents, they know it is pretty subjective, he has heard from new <br />and long-time residents, but staff has never done a survey about the noise. <br />City Council Minutes 12 October 16, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.