My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072507
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 072507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:57 PM
Creation date
10/29/2007 9:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/25/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> <br />a. PUD-99-01-04M, Jeremy and Josie Barnish <br />Application for a major modification to allow an existing solid fence to remain, <br />where open fencing is required, along a portion of the rear and side property line <br />of the property located at 4546 River Rock Hill Road. Zoning for the property is <br />PUD-RDR/LDR (Planned Unit Development – Rural Density Residential/Low <br />Density Residential) District. <br /> <br /> This item was continued to August 8, 2007. <br /> <br />6.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br /> <br />a. Review and consideration of the Introduction and Draft Land Use Element <br />of the General Plan <br /> <br />Janice Stern noted that staff required additional time to polish up the Introduction and, <br />hence, only the Draft General Plan Land Use Element would be considered at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern stated that the Land Use Element is a required element of the General Plan and <br />serves as a guide to planners, the general public, and decision-makers with respect to <br />development at build-out. She added that the Land Use Element is where all land use <br />issues are correlated into a set of coherent development policies and requires the <br />designation of the proposed distribution, location, and extent of land for housing as <br />shown in the Land Use Map, business, industry, open space, public buildings, and natural <br />resources, as well as the standards for population density and building intensity. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern indicated that several objectives have emerged from discussion at multiple <br />Joint City Council-Planning Commission workshops and other meetings and are <br />expressed in the Draft Land Use Element as follows: <br />? <br /> <br />Sustainable development to help the City move to a more sustainable community; <br />? <br /> <br />Providing flexibility in determining the location of remaining residential units; <br />? <br /> <br />Providing additional opportunities for development of affordable housing, which <br />will mean looking back at the Housing Element policies and completing what <br />needs to be done in terms of designating additional land for multi-family and <br />high-density housing as well as looking at affordable housing by design and the <br />types of housing that can be developed in the future to meet that need; and <br />? <br /> <br />Contemplating future Specific Plans in East Pleasanton and at Hacienda Business <br />Park, which are future change areas discussed in earlier workshops. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern then presented a table with information regarding the remaining residential <br />units and the 29,000-unit cap. She explained that in this discussion, an assumption has to <br />be made that development will take place at midpoint of the density range. She added, <br />however, that this is not always the case as approval in the past few years has been <br />slightly lower than midpoint; high-density development has no upper limits which results <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 25, 2007 Page 6 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.