My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 87327
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
RES 87327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2012 9:11:05 AM
Creation date
12/8/1999 1:13:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
interpretive displays, and view/rest areas. The <br /> proposed project will allow for improved interface of <br /> the user with the park setting and qualities. <br /> Improvements to the park should not result in impacts on <br /> viewsheds from the ridge or from the valley floor, given <br /> the ~imited man-made improvements proposed. <br /> Hiking/equestrian trails will be restricted in order to <br /> preserve as much of the natural environment as possible. <br /> <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br /> 14. Impacts on Archaeological or Historical Sites <br /> <br /> No known sites are present. However, if archaeological <br /> or historical sites are uncovered, construction should <br /> be halted and an appropriate evaluation of the resources <br /> made. <br /> <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br /> Yes No <br /> <br /> 15. Is there any serious public ~ <br /> controversy concerning the <br /> environmental effects of the proposed project? <br /> If so, list below. <br /> <br />III.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> <br /> 1. Does the project have the potential <br /> to degrade the quality of the environment, <br /> substantially reduce the habitat of a fish <br /> or wildlife species, cause a fish or <br /> wildlife population to drop below self <br /> sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a <br /> plant or animal community, reduce the number <br /> or restrict the range of a rare or endangered <br /> plant or animal or eliminate important <br /> examples of the major periods of California <br /> history or prehistory? <br /> <br /> 2. Does the project have the potential <br /> to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage <br /> of long-term, environmental goals? (A <br /> short-term impact on the environment is <br /> one which occurs in relatively brief, <br /> definitive period of time while long-term <br /> impacts will ensure well into the future.) <br /> <br /> - 6 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.