My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 07152
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
RES 07152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2007 1:25:27 PM
Creation date
10/17/2007 1:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 07152
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. Impact on the Movement of Any Species (pp. 1 i0, 120 and 359/360; Condition 9f <br />of PUD-33; MMIP D9). <br />a. Potentiallmpact. <br />The Original Project's potential impacts on CTS and CRLF movement to offsite <br />breeding habitat from direct mortality are discussed in the DEIR at page 110 and the <br />Environmentally Superior Project's impacts are discussed at page 360. <br />b. Mitigation Measures. <br />The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as <br />provided for in the Mitigation Monitoring and Implementation Program: <br />Implement Oak Grove Planned Unit Development (PUD-33) Mitigation <br />Measure D9. <br />c. Findings. <br />Based on the EIR and the entire record before the City, the City finds that: <br />(i) Effects of Mitigation. <br />The Environmentally Superior Project's potential impacts on CTS and CRLF movement <br />to off-site breeding habitat from direct mortality will be mitigated to less-than-significant <br />levels through the implementation of the mitigation measure which requires construction <br />of Hearst Drive wildlife crossing features. These features are described in Mitigation <br />Measures D1 and D2 and, the Environmentally Superior Project, as conditioned, will be <br />required to be submitted to the Planning Director and the City Engineer for review and <br />approval before the City's action on the first final subdivision map. <br />(ii) Remaining Impacts. <br />Any remaining impacts related to impacts to CTS and CRLF movement to offsite <br />breeding habitat will be less than significant. <br />10. Conflict with the Protection of Biological Resources (pp. 111, 120-121 and <br />359/360; Conditions 51-57 of PUD-33; MMIP D 10). <br />a. Potentiallmpact. <br />The Original Project's potential impacts due to the removal of up to 90 Heritage trees <br />and impacts on an additional 44 Heritage trees are discussed in the DEIR at page 111 <br />and the Environmentally Superior Project's impacts on 32 Heritage Trees are discussed <br />at page 360. <br />Page 23 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.