Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Narum expressed hesitation about the use of story poles because they tend <br />to be misrepresented and misinterpreted by neighbors to the detriment of an otherwise <br />good project. She felt that the story poles for the Alviso Adobe silo had played a part in <br />causing the project to be rejected. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that story poles were an engineering challenge for a project of this size <br />because they had to withstand the elements and could not be a distraction to freeway <br />traffic, yet be visible as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum would like to see simulated visuals. Ms. Decker noted that visuals <br />would probably be more helpful and that story poles did not have the benefit of being <br />easily understood or representing pre-existing landscaping. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox believed it would be beneficial for the neighborhood to understand the <br />height by the use of a story pole where the height of the dome would be at the top of the <br />pole and with a mark on where the glass dome would start. <br /> <br /> <br />No action was taken. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that it was past 11:00 p.m. and inquired about starting the <br />discussion of new items. <br /> <br />a. Tabled motion: Consideration of whether to take the motion made by <br />Commissioner Olson on July 11, 2007 from the table; if majority support to do so, <br />then consider Commissioner Olson’s July 11, 2007 motion. <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />b. Discussion of the types of projects to be placed on the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that this item could take considerable time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank suggested that Item 7.b. be tabled for a future meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor was unsure whether the discussion would take very long and <br />noted that Commissioner Narum had wanted all the Commissioners to be present. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox did not believe there was any urgency to that item and supported <br />continuing it. She suggested placing it at the beginning of the agenda. <br /> <br />Ms. Seto noted that procedure items were often placed at the end of the agenda to allow <br />public hearing items to be heard. She suggested continuing it to a meeting where the <br />agenda was not as heavy. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 8, 2007 Page 22 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />