Laserfiche WebLink
pass throughs. This agreement, and the companion Agreement Concerning Capital <br />Improvements, eliminate that financial risk. <br />Key Elements of the Hacienda Mobilehome Park Agreement <br />Most of the key elements of the proposed Hacienda Mobilehome Park Agreement are <br />the same as for those in the Vineyard Mobile Villa. Due, however, to the maintenance <br />issues about which the residents have expressed concern, there are additional, more <br />specific, maintenance related standards referenced in this Agreement. For example, <br />street light outings have been cited as a hazard to residents so the Agreement spells <br />out that all street lights are to be operational by December 31, 2007 and that the owner <br />shall continually maintain all street lights in operating condition. Similarly, the <br />Agreement calls for the Maintenance Committee (made up of residents) to identify those <br />sidewalk areas that are in need of repair and sets forth a timetable for the owner to have <br />that work done. Other maintenance standards include the owners providing a large <br />dumpster twice a year for the residents' use and for park management to clean out all <br />park storm drains as necessary and as needed during the winter months. Maintenance <br />of landscaping (or the lack thereof) has also been a matter of concern to the residents <br />so there will beatable (modeled after the City's standard specifications) that details the <br />areas of landscaping (turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees) and the frequency of work, <br />such as fertilizing, weeding, etc., that needs to be done. <br />In the Vineyard Villa agreements, the owner has agreed to repair and replace all the <br />capital improvements in the park in perpetuity in exchange for a rent increase. The <br />Hacienda residents, concerned about their owner's history of deferred maintenance, <br />were not willing to recommend that the City enter into the exact same agreement with <br />the Hacienda owner at this time. Rather, the residents wanted to have a trial period <br />during which the owner would have the opportunity to demonstrate that he would use <br />the rent increase funds for a number of capital improvements, such as a new clubhouse <br />roof, new perimeter fencing, the sidewalk repairs mentioned above, and a new irrigation <br />system and landscaping. Accordingly, under this Agreement, residents would pay $17 <br />or $34 (depending on when they moved into the Park) more per month than what they <br />are currently paying for the owner's agreement to assume the cost of all capital <br />improvements over the next five years. The owner must provide to the City an annual <br />accounting of how much was collected, what capital improvements were repaired, <br />replaced or installed, and their cost. <br />At the end of five years, the owner must show that he has completed all the capital <br />improvements that he agreed to complete and that all the funds collected for that <br />purpose have either been spent or there are other specific identified capital <br />improvements (with estimated costs) for which the funds will be spent. If that can be <br />demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City, then the $17/$34 would go into effect <br />permanently, as would the owner's obligation to repair, replace and construct all Park <br />capital improvements. On the other hand, if the owner fails to perform or fails to spend <br />all the collected funds for capital improvements, the unspent funds must be returned to <br />the residents and the rent increases for this purpose go away. Hence, the park owner <br />should be sufficiently motivated to meet his obligations. <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />